← Search

Zana Piric

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
330 matches · 146W–184L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history330 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Su.Paeplow18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Lilley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-02 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-01 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-01 · #3 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · Su.Paeplow18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Szwarc
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-10 · Ch.Hochstrasser40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christa Hochstrasser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-08 · Ch.Hochstrasser40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Garnett Webb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-29 · Su.Paeplow18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Szwarc
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · Su.Paeplow18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin McAllister
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Su.Paeplow18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Szwarc
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ch.Hochstrasser40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marjorie Diaz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · Su.Paeplow18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marcia Fort
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 45.3% of games
4.0
42.1%
77W–106L · 48.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 32.3% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 41% of games
7.5
42.5%
34W–46L · 48.8% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57% of games
4.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
58 matches
#1 Singles
6%
19 matches
#2 Singles
5%
15 matches
Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova