Teams

DTC YELLOW

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-23vs CACM BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesJeannie Crawford / Kathleen Andrews vs Bev Morrow / Mary Beth Church3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Peggy Andersen / Mary Deluccia7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLiz Donahue / Julie Underdahl vs Karla Simons / Helen Wilson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-16vs LTC REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Jeannie Crawford vs Vera Aaron / Pamela Schmidt6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Liz Donahue vs April Kobayashi / Ellen Muller7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-09vs MC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Karen Polzin vs Lauren Arnold / Deborah Bautista6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Julie Underdahl vs Ellen Davis / Peggy Hofstra7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Jann Peterson vs Patricia Demers / Ana Bland3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-02vs GTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Karen Polzin vs Suzette Emerson / Lisa Winston2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Julie Underdahl vs Lisa Snider / Betty Murray6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Linda Feiman vs Kristen Hanson / Barbara Worthington6-4, 6-4
2021-05-26vs CACM GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Kathy Sabin / Claudia Pillow6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Liz Donahue vs Pam Ammann / Monika Rebholz6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Teri Smith vs Anne Angerman / Susan High2-6, 1-6
2021-05-19vs NJ TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Polzin / Kathleen Andrews vs Cynthia Snavely / Helen Hock6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJann Peterson / Kathy Graveley vs Judy Ferrin / Christie Bibeau6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTeri Smith / Elizabeth Kelly vs Jo Johnson / Lee Duhl6-4, 6-4
2021-05-12vs NJ BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Liz Donahue vs Nancy Stapp / Becky Myers6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTeri Smith / Elizabeth Kelly vs Vilura Haas / Penelope Ganter6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Jann Peterson vs Carol Williams / Mary Harter6-3, 6-3
2021-05-07vs LTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Karen Polzin vs Pamela Schmidt / Nancy Driver7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Julie Underdahl vs Ginny Laadt / Barbara Woodward7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Teri Smith vs Vera Aaron / April Kobayashi4-6, 3-6
2021-05-05vs CACM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Karen Polzin vs Mary Beth Church / Bev Morrow3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Jann Peterson vs Peggy Andersen / Mary Deluccia4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Susan Boulden vs Paula Broe / Juli Bulloch3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Liz Donahue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Julie Underdahl
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.11
Jann Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Linda Feiman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Teri Smith
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Graveley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jeannie Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Polzin
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Kathleen Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Feiman + Jody Hunnicutt10358% games+7.1% vs expected
Jeannie Crawford + Kathleen Andrews13264% games+6.3% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Karen Polzin12556% games+1.3% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Jann Peterson171058% games+1.2% vs expected
Julie Underdahl + Jann Peterson2548% games−0.1% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Julie Underdahl6552% games−2.6% vs expected
Karen Polzin + Kathleen Andrews6449% games−9.7% vs expected
Linda Feiman + Kathy Graveley8462% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Liz Donahue
45W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Julie Underdahl
53W–63L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%9%91%
3.17
3.5
Jann Peterson
51W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Linda Feiman
55W–28L career · 1 line in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
Teri Smith
36W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kathy Graveley
38W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeannie Crawford
21W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Polzin
33W–19L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Andrews
39W–17L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.