Teams

NJ TEAL

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-23vs MC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Mary Bare vs Michelle Workman / Janice Tanabe6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Peterson / Helen Hock vs Patricia Demers / Deborah Bautista3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Mittag-Miller / Christie Bibeau vs Kerry Robbins / Ana Bland5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-16vs GTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Peterson / Jo Johnson vs Lisa Winston / Kristen Hanson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Mittag-Miller / Christie Bibeau vs Tamara Bianchi / Sue Hickey2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Ferrin / Lee Duhl vs Lisa Snider / Betty Murray0-6, 1-6
2021-06-09vs CACM GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Lee Duhl vs Deidre Shanley / Claudia Pillow6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Mittag-Miller / Mary Bare vs Susan High / Anne Angerman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Ferrin / Christie Bibeau vs Monika Rebholz / Pam Ammann6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-02vs CACM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Helen Hock vs Karla Simons / Helen Wilson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Shields / Kathy Peterson vs Bev Morrow / Juli Bulloch0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Mittag-Miller / Mary Bare vs Melanie Darden / Kathryn Ague6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2021-05-26vs NJ BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Bare / Cynthia Snavely vs Penelope Ganter / Vilura Haas6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelen Hock / Kathy Peterson vs Mary Harter / Janice Cook2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Mittag-Miller / Jo Johnson vs Connie Tucker / Carol Williams3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-19vs DTC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Helen Hock vs Karen Polzin / Kathleen Andrews4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Ferrin / Christie Bibeau vs Jann Peterson / Kathy Graveley0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJo Johnson / Lee Duhl vs Teri Smith / Elizabeth Kelly4-6, 4-6
2021-05-16vs LTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristie Bibeau / Mary Bare vs April Kobayashi / Margo Constable5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Wanda Shepherd vs Vera Aaron / Martha McNamara6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathy Peterson / Lee Duhl vs Nancy Driver / Pamela Schmidt1-6, 3-6
2021-05-14vs GTC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Shields / Lee Duhl vs Suzette Emerson / Lisa Winston0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Ferrin / Christie Bibeau vs Barbara Worthington / Kristen Hanson7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJo Johnson / Mary Bare vs Betty Murray / Sue Hickey3-6, 3-6
2021-05-05vs MC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Mittag-Miller / Christie Bibeau vs Michelle Workman / Patricia Demers2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Peterson / Helen Hock vs Kerry Robbins / Kathleen Keating6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Shields / Wanda Shepherd vs Ciel Lawrence / Tammy Chamberlain7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Cynthia Snavely
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.08
Wanda Shepherd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Helen Hock
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.82
Mary Mittag-Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Christie Bibeau
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.62
Elizabeth Shields
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jo Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Ferrin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lee Duhl
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Bare
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Snavely + Wanda Shepherd8361% games+10.5% vs expected
Cynthia Snavely + Lee Duhl3450% games+8.5% vs expected
Mary Bare + Kathy Peterson0538% games−1.6% vs expected
Helen Hock + Elizabeth Shields3447% games−3.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Shields + Wanda Shepherd1542% games−4.3% vs expected
Wanda Shepherd + Kathy Peterson5545% games−6.3% vs expected
Cynthia Snavely + Helen Hock4449% games−6.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Shields + Mary Bare0837% games−8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Snavely
78W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
Kathy Peterson
43W–89L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Wanda Shepherd
39W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Helen Hock
39W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Mary Mittag-Miller
14W–30L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Christie Bibeau
93W–141L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elizabeth Shields
25W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
2.62
Jo Johnson
34W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Judy Ferrin
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lee Duhl
9W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Bare
30W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.