Teams

KY/LOU/WALKER/BERRY

2025 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER DAYTIME LEAGUE · Women's Tuesday Morning 4.0,3.5,3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-12vs KY/LOU/STACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelanie Berry / Mary Wallitsch vs Jenna Brayton / Cara Robinson6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHannah Sencindiver / Sarah Merrick vs Mary Beth Meagher / Jessica Scheiner6-3, 6-2
2025-07-29vs KY/LOU/DONNELL/CAMPITELLALost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Berry / Emily Schmidt vs Maggi Donnell / Lauren Campitella1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesShannon Kessler / Becky French vs Revonda Green / Jayme Wurtenberger5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Sencindiver / Elizabeth Goodknight vs Amanda Skinger / Melissa O'Neill6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-07-15vs KY/LOU/SCHALLER/SCOTTLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Priddy / Emily Schmidt vs Shannon Kraft / Meagan Claypool1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShannon Kessler / Jen Root vs Lisa Bruneau / Alison Scott3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBecky French / Sarah Merrick vs Deana Paradis / Gina Rosiello1-6, 2-6
2025-07-08vs KY/LOU/STACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Berry / Taryn Walker vs Michea Dicken / Jennifer Dickerson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJen Root / Catie Wilson vs Abbie Leffert / Missy Varga4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBecky French / Sarah Merrick vs Jessica Scheiner / Mary Beth Meagher6-2, 6-2
2025-06-24vs KY/LOU/DONNELL/CAMPITELLALost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Berry / Taryn Walker vs Maggi Donnell / Lauren Campitella5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Kessler / Elizabeth Goodknight vs Alexandra Deal / Lindsey Newcomer3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJen Root / Becky French vs Amanda Skinger / Jennifer Agurto6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs KY/LOU/SCHALLER/SCOTTWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Wallitsch / Emily Schmidt vs Emily White / Shannon Kraft6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulia Mackenzie-Rollinson / Jamie Priddy vs Alison Scott / Deborah Riggs7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatie Wilson / Shannon Kessler vs Gina Rosiello / Deana Paradis1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Tuesday Morning 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Melanie Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Emily Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Taryn Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Julia Mackenzie-Rollinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Mary Wallitsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Jamie Priddy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Shannon Kessler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Becky French
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
Elizabeth Goodknight
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Jen Root
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Catie Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Hannah Sencindiver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Sarah Merrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Kessler + Jen Root3262% games+11.3% vs expected
Jen Root + Catie Wilson3254% games+6.8% vs expected
Shannon Kessler + Catie Wilson3350% games+5.3% vs expected
Taryn Walker + Melanie Berry181949% games+3.3% vs expected
Mary Wallitsch + Emily Schmidt4162% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Goodknight + Shannon Kessler224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Goodknight + Becky French404 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Goodknight + Sarah Merrick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Berry
31W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Emily Schmidt
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Taryn Walker
25W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Julia Mackenzie-Rollinson
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Mary Wallitsch
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jamie Priddy
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Shannon Kessler
31W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Becky French
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Elizabeth Goodknight
30W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Jen Root
24W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Catie Wilson
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Hannah Sencindiver
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Sarah Merrick
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.