Teams

DWilliams

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-05vs KSerowSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTheresa Rosario-Jansen / Jorgelina Stroud vs Carol Vervaert / Debra Allen6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Susan Starnes vs Carol Rosser / Kim Hopkins3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-14vs KSerowWon 10
W#2 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Suzanne Ruggles vs Lucine Barker / Carol Rosser6-1, 6-4
2022-04-07vs VFleischmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Phoebe Hill vs Judy Colby / Barb Davis6-2, 7-6
2022-03-31Split 11
L#1 DoublesPhoebe Hill / Suzanne Ruggles vs Helen Norona / Robyn Ziperski2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Diane Williams vs Donna Rutigliano / Sara May6-3, 6-1
2022-03-26vs VFleischmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Jorgelina Stroud vs Jane Diepenbrock / Catherine Chavez6-3, 7-6
2022-03-26vs KSerowWon 10
W#3 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Suzanne Ruggles vs Carol Vervaert / Kathleen Serow6-2, 6-2
2022-03-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Phoebe Hill vs Robyn Ziperski / Helen Norona6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Suzanne Ruggles
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.87
2.73
Sonja Scalia
published
2.63
Jorgelina Stroud
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Mimi Crews
published
2.57
Susan Starnes
published
Phoebe Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jorgelina Stroud + Suzanne Ruggles181850% games+8.6% vs expected
Suzanne Ruggles + Susan Starnes224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Suzanne Ruggles
184W–162L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Theresa Rosario-Jansen
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
Sonja Scalia
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jorgelina Stroud
121W–177L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Mimi Crews
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Susan Starnes
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.57
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.