Teams

VFleischman

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-05vs RZiperskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Mary Strothmann vs DEBRA LAUGHERY / Justine Saleeby6-2, 7-6
2022-04-28vs DWilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Strothmann / Norma Wolcott vs Phoebe Hill / Diane Williams2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-21vs KSerowLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Chavez / Priscilla Nanney vs Lucine Barker / Jennifer Tun3-6, 4-6
2022-04-14vs RZiperskiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJudy Colby / Mary Strothmann vs Lesa Edwards / Justine Saleeby6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Sally Sikes vs Penny Cobb / Sara May5-7, 1-6
2022-04-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Diepenbrock / Priscilla Nanney vs Diane Williams / Tina Parker4-6, 2-6
2022-04-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Chavez / Priscilla Nanney vs Donna Rutigliano / Robyn Ziperski2-6, 0-6
2022-03-31vs KSerowLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Diepenbrock / Priscilla Nanney vs Liza Gettles / Frederica Shipman0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-03-26vs DWilliamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Mary Strothmann vs Susan Starnes / Diane Williams6-7, 1-6
2022-03-03vs KSerowWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Strothmann / Priscilla Nanney vs Carol Vervaert / Debra Allen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Norma Wolcott
published
2.96
Mary Strothmann
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Judy Colby
published
Ellen Werner
published 3
2.55
Priscilla Nanney
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
2.50
Lavonne Moore
published
2.42
Sally Sikes
published
Jane Diepenbrock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Nanney + Mary Strothmann121847% games−2.0% vs expected
Norma Wolcott + Mary Strothmann314 matchesnot enough data
Priscilla Nanney + Norma Wolcott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Norma Wolcott
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Mary Strothmann
111W–114L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Judy Colby
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Ellen Werner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Priscilla Nanney
41W–122L career · 8 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Lavonne Moore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Sally Sikes
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42
Jane Diepenbrock
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.