Teams

SB LLW-Unstrung-Beth Ford

2024 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Women Doubles - 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-17vs LCCC-I’d Hit ThatSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYoko Newburg / Yang Ja Ballard vs MacY McGinness / Sheri Copus7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBeth Ford / Deanne Saucerman vs Nanette Giordano / Kerry Gidney6-7, 4-6
2024-11-03vs Elings-English MuffinsLost 02
L#1 DoublesYang Ja Ballard / Yoko Newburg vs Paula Skokowski / Kristen Kovacs3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKC Collins / Katherine Fabbre vs Bina Ahmed / Alicia Linquiti4-6, 6-7
2024-10-20vs Alisal-RancherosWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeanne Saucerman / Nahed Stefany vs Gigi Hollister / Bianca Sweeney4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYoko Newburg / Yang Ja Ballard vs Michelle Adam / Jennifer Jarvis6-2, 6-3
2024-10-20vs SBTC-Volley GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatherine Fabbre / Beverly Aronson vs Tricia Fahnoe / Shauna Quill4-6, 1-6
2024-10-13vs LCCC-I’d Hit ThatLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Cushing / Katherine Fabbre vs Bess Scribner / Kerry Gidney6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-29vs Elings-English MuffinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeanne Saucerman / Yoko Newburg vs Paula Skokowski / Kristen Kovacs7-5, 6-3
2024-09-22vs Alisal-RancherosWon 30
W#1 DoublesNahed Stefany / Nancy Garrison vs Bianca Sweeney / Gigi Hollister6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDeanne Saucerman / Yang Ja Ballard vs Kristin Story / Stella Hahn6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Coffman / Beverly Aronson vs Jen Haskell / Maribel Orozco7-6, 7-5
2024-09-15vs SBTC-Volley GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Garrison / Beverly Aronson vs Julie Rosenthal / Renee Hennessee6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeth Ford / Yang Ja Ballard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Deanne Saucerman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Nahed Stefany
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Beth Ford
published 4
3.89
Yang Ja Ballard
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Yoko Newburg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Nancy Garrison
published
3.74
Beverly Aronson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Julia Cushing
published
3.71
Vanessa Guenther
published
3.71
Ming Yi
published
3.57
Sarah Coffman
published
3.52
KC Collins
published
3.33
Katherine Fabbre
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Camilla Thompson
published 3.5
3.16
Sally Jordan
published
Susana Loewe
published
Terrie Bugay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Cushing + Vanessa Guenther5075% games+21.8% vs expected
Katherine Fabbre + KC Collins5166% games+9.8% vs expected
Yang Ja Ballard + Deanne Saucerman6358% games+7.9% vs expected
Beverly Aronson + Sarah Coffman4258% games+5.0% vs expected
Beth Ford + Yang Ja Ballard16364% games+3.7% vs expected
Nancy Garrison + Beverly Aronson6160% games−2.2% vs expected
Nahed Stefany + Yoko Newburg17656% games−3.4% vs expected
Yang Ja Ballard + Yoko Newburg4257% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deanne Saucerman
156W–88L career · 4 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Nahed Stefany
267W–157L career · 2 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Beth Ford
89W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Yang Ja Ballard
137W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Yoko Newburg
122W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Nancy Garrison
31W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Beverly Aronson
111W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Julia Cushing
40W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Vanessa Guenther
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Ming Yi
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Sarah Coffman
19W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
KC Collins
57W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Katherine Fabbre
71W–74L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Camilla Thompson
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Sally Jordan
38W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.16
Susana Loewe
30W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terrie Bugay
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.