Teams

Seniorritas

2026 65 & Over USTA Adult League · Ladies 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-26vs Begins with Love AllLost 12
W#1 DoublesCathy Dooley / Mary Deeann Gabro vs Ginny Bell / Carolyn Orgill5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRita Evans / Elaine Yellen vs Jessica Fitch / Deborah Johnson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Hagopian / Maggie Pustejovsky vs Ann Flanagan / Wes Horn4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-12vs Begins with Love AllWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargot Hopkins / Cathy McCoy vs Ginny Bell / Wes Horn6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBecky Robertson / Celista Halpert vs Jessica Fitch / Laurie Haynes7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElaine Yellen / Chris Scroggs vs Deborah Johnson / Carolyn Orgill3-6, 5-7
2026-03-29vs Begins with Love AllWon 21
W#1 DoublesVicki Jamison / Nancy Hagopian vs Ginny Bell / Carolyn Orgill6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarron Rapach / Mary Deeann Gabro vs Deborah Trevino / Wes Horn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaggie Pustejovsky / Melanie Beyer vs Deborah Johnson / Jessica Fitch5-7, 1-6
2026-03-22vs Begins with Love AllLost 02
L#1 DoublesVicki Jamison / Carron Rapach vs Ann Flanagan / Laurie Haynes1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Dooley / Cathy McCoy vs Jessica Fitch / Deborah Johnson5-7, 5-7
2026-03-16vs Begins with Love AllWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Dooley / Mary Deeann Gabro vs Ginny Bell / Deborah Trevino6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargot Hopkins / Becky Robertson vs Laurie Haynes / Wes Horn7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCelista Halpert / Nancy Hagopian vs Deborah Johnson / Jessica Fitch6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Seniorritas328717137
2Begins with Love All237819154

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Vicki Jamison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Margot Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Mary Deeann Gabro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Cathy McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Cathy Dooley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Rita Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Nancy Hagopian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Celista Halpert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Maggie Pustejovsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Becky Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Cathy Turnbough
published 3
2.50
Chris Scroggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Melanie Beyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Carron Rapach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Elaine Yellen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Deeann Gabro + Cathy Dooley4158% games+4.1% vs expected
Rita Evans + Cathy Dooley2449% games−4.0% vs expected
Cathy McCoy + Cathy Dooley2346% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Beyer + Celista Halpert224 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Jamison + Cathy Dooley314 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Turnbough + Nancy Hagopian314 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Beyer + Becky Robertson123 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Jamison + Cathy McCoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Jamison
53W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
Margot Hopkins
33W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Mary Deeann Gabro
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Cathy McCoy
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Cathy Dooley
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Rita Evans
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Nancy Hagopian
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Celista Halpert
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69
Maggie Pustejovsky
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Becky Robertson
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Cathy Turnbough
6W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Chris Scroggs
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Melanie Beyer
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Carron Rapach
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Elaine Yellen
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.