Teams

Begins with Love All

2026 65 & Over USTA Adult League · Ladies 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-26vs SeniorritasWon 21
L#1 DoublesGinny Bell / Carolyn Orgill vs Cathy Dooley / Mary Deeann Gabro7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Fitch / Deborah Johnson vs Rita Evans / Elaine Yellen6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnn Flanagan / Wes Horn vs Nancy Hagopian / Maggie Pustejovsky6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-12vs SeniorritasLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinny Bell / Wes Horn vs Margot Hopkins / Cathy McCoy2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Fitch / Laurie Haynes vs Becky Robertson / Celista Halpert6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Johnson / Carolyn Orgill vs Elaine Yellen / Chris Scroggs6-3, 7-5
2026-03-29vs SeniorritasLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinny Bell / Carolyn Orgill vs Vicki Jamison / Nancy Hagopian4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Trevino / Wes Horn vs Carron Rapach / Mary Deeann Gabro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Johnson / Jessica Fitch vs Maggie Pustejovsky / Melanie Beyer7-5, 6-1
2026-03-22vs SeniorritasWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnn Flanagan / Laurie Haynes vs Vicki Jamison / Carron Rapach6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Fitch / Deborah Johnson vs Cathy Dooley / Cathy McCoy7-5, 7-5
2026-03-16vs SeniorritasLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinny Bell / Deborah Trevino vs Cathy Dooley / Mary Deeann Gabro2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Haynes / Wes Horn vs Margot Hopkins / Becky Robertson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Johnson / Jessica Fitch vs Celista Halpert / Nancy Hagopian4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Seniorritas328717137
2Begins with Love All237819154

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Deborah Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Ginny Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Jessica Fitch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Aurora Robles
published 3
2.62
Wes Horn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Carolyn Orgill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Laurie Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Deborah Trevino
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Ginny Bell
6W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jessica Fitch
11W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Aurora Robles
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Wes Horn
13W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62
3
Carolyn Orgill
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Laurie Haynes
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.