Teams

Knights at Court/Heum/El Cariso

2026 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Knights at Court/Heum/El Cariso000000
2Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh/Burbank000000
3TA SFV/Ur/Scholl000000
4Paseo United4.0/Zeltser/Paseo000000
5The 300's/Soucy/Calabasas000000
6Toluca Lakers/DiNardo-Hofstein/Toluca Lake000000
7The Rocky Balboas/Tovar/Balboa000000
8Quakes/Esguerra-Oetomo/CSUN000000
9Scholland Garros/Han-Im/Scholl000000
10Mulholland Tennis Club/Morris-Geha000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Sara Heum
published 4
3.60
Tom Pudpai
published
3.58
michael fang
published
3.52
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.50
Rafael Molina
published
3.49
Hayk Ghulijanyan
published 3.5
3.47
Shawn Broukhim
published
3.39
Ola Heum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ola Heum + Hayk Ghulijanyan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sara Heum
122W–70L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Tom Pudpai
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
michael fang
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Rafael Molina
8W–20L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Hayk Ghulijanyan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Shawn Broukhim
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47
Ola Heum
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.