Teams

MJones (Life Time)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-11vs KHaywood (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesHillary Kroboth vs Katie Haywood6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMegan Pruski vs Traci Semones6-3, 6-3
2023-07-21vs KHaywood (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 SinglesHillary Kroboth vs Katie Haywood7-6, 6-4
2023-06-30vs KHaywood (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesHillary Kroboth vs Nicole Woodley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMegan Pruski vs Traci Semones3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Corine Danesis
published 4
3.72
Megan Pruski
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Kathleen Johnstone
published
3.67
Allison Misson
published 4
3.44
Sonia Waters
published
3.41
Dana Holloman
published 3.5
3.40
Hillary Kroboth
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Kristy Simmons
published
3.16
Misty Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Simmons + Sonia Waters224 matchesnot enough data
Corine Danesis + Megan Pruski314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corine Danesis
34W–29L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Megan Pruski
71W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
Kathleen Johnstone
33W–38L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Allison Misson
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Sonia Waters
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Dana Holloman
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Hillary Kroboth
87W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kristy Simmons
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Misty Jones
27W–30L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.