Teams

KHaywood (OPRC)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-11vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesTraci Semones vs Megan Pruski3-6, 3-6
2023-07-21vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Bundrick vs Corine Danesis1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Danesis vs Dana Holloman1-6, 5-7
2023-07-14Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Bundrick vs Christine Brenner6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Danesis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-30vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesTraci Semones vs Megan Pruski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-23Split 11
W#2 SinglesAmy Bundrick vs Anne Schmitt6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJosey Waleski vs Stacey Young3-6, 2-6
2023-06-09vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Bundrick vs Corine Danesis0-6, 6-7
2023-06-02vs ASchmitt (Olde Providence)Won 20
W#2 SinglesAmy Bundrick vs Stacey Young6-0, 7-5
W#3 SinglesJennifer Danesis vs Katie Monson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Traci Semones
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.83
Katie Haywood
published
3.81
Amy Bundrick
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.72
Erin Lentz
published 4
3.60
Nicole Woodley
published
3.51
Maren Juell
published
3.50
Jennifer Danesis
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Josey Waleski
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Semones + Maren Juell5067% games+15.4% vs expected
Nicole Woodley + Erin Lentz7457% games+4.0% vs expected
Jennifer Danesis + Josey Waleski7357% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Danesis + Maren Juell123 matchesnot enough data
Traci Semones + Nicole Woodley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Traci Semones
139W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.86
Katie Haywood
29W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Amy Bundrick
29W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Erin Lentz
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Nicole Woodley
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
Maren Juell
27W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Jennifer Danesis
66W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Josey Waleski
67W–63L career · 1 line in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.