Teams

Wisehaven - Crowley

2024 USTA 40 & Over Mx Doubles League · 8.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.55 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-10vs RCW - CampbellLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Jeet Sandhu vs Audrey Troop / Steve Staman0-6, 1-6
2023-11-17vs RCW - SumarSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Jeet Sandhu vs Ariff Sumar / Mary Musser6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Moran / Jennifer Small vs Frederick JR Shaak / Catherine Shaak4-6, 5-7
2023-10-27vs Hempfield - ThomanLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteve Steele / Deborah Fishel vs Bonnie Westheaffer / Wilson Pipkin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTroy Petry / Anna Lamond vs Linda Strange / Edward Conway4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-20vs YACTA - HeinzelmannLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Lamond / Steve Steele vs Karen Sipe / Cory Barnes1-6, 4-6
2023-10-06vs West Shore - TruongLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Lamond / Troy Petry vs Melissa Ruggiero / Erik Ruggiero1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDeborah Fishel / Steve Steele vs Steven Grubb / Natalie Grubb4-6, 5-7
2023-09-30vs Hempfield - SchwearLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Moran / Deborah Fishel vs Melissa Landis / George Georgelis4-6, 3-6
2023-09-29vs Hempfield - LawrenceLost 03
L#1 DoublesTroy Petry / Robin Treider vs Mitchell Forry / Becky Katz7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Jeet Sandhu vs Herlie Velez / Kelli Velez3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Fishel / Matt Moran vs Victor Fissella / Kim Wojciechowski3-6, 1-6
2023-09-08vs Hershey - HarndenLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Keeney / Kimberly Sandhu vs Kevin Rowland / Nicole Nikolaus1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Lamond / Carl Strozyk vs Elizabeth O'Donnell / Pablo Martinez2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 8.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wisehaven - Rishel010201024236
2Hempfield - Felices/Banh010191125243
3Hempfield - Triano/Cohen010181229264
4Hempfield - Stauffer010181230278
5YACTA - Pomraning010141634278
6Hempfield - Hangen 40mx010121840302
7Wisehaven - Crowley010111942306
8Hershey - Prestige World Wide010111942309
9Lanc CC - Shelton010111943307
10West Shore Mixed Nuts (Ruch)010102044313
11Hempfield - Weik/Nolt01082245298
12Hempfield - Baumer01042653339

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kimberly Sandhu
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.65
Anthony LaVigne
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Jeet Sandhu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Troy Petry
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published 4
3.39
Cynthia Crowley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Brian Keeney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Steve Steele
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Robin Treider
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Deborah Fishel
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Anna Lamond
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Carl Strozyk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Matt Moran
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Crowley + Anthony LaVigne291160% games+13.8% vs expected
Jeet Sandhu + Anna Lamond4257% games+13.0% vs expected
Anna Lamond + Brian Keeney5253% games+9.6% vs expected
Robin Treider + Anthony LaVigne8557% games+8.0% vs expected
Jeet Sandhu + Kimberly Sandhu251555% games+6.9% vs expected
Robin Treider + Brian Keeney231453% games+4.5% vs expected
Deborah Fishel + Matt Moran10751% games+3.0% vs expected
Cynthia Crowley + Steve Steele7550% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kimberly Sandhu
275W–138L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
3.5
Anthony LaVigne
182W–59L career · type A · 9 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Jeet Sandhu
108W–69L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.50
4
Troy Petry
146W–95L career · 12 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Cynthia Crowley
138W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Brian Keeney
163W–112L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Steve Steele
69W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Robin Treider
136W–146L career · 14 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Deborah Fishel
69W–47L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Anna Lamond
186W–212L career · 10 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Carl Strozyk
33W–42L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Matt Moran
67W–43L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.