Teams

SATA/Christi Wood

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Women) - Fall

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-22vs Landings - KaneWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeanna Childers / Lola Bradshaw vs Suzanne Olin / Joni Brownstein6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Winslow / Deanna Childers vs Kim Grimmett / Dorothy Lee6-2, 6-2
2024-09-17Won 20
W#2 DoublesTammy Winslow / Deanna Childers vs Douglass Smith / Sandra Davis6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBernadette Staudt / Lola Bradshaw vs Melanie Young / Martha Mathews6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Women) - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Adele Muller
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.90
Evan Pollock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Tracy Burks
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.80
Christi Wood
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Bernadette Staudt
usually #3 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.78
Deanna Childers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Janet Caswell
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.70
Emily Jowers
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 4
3.60
Lola Bradshaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Sharon Zellerer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sylvia Howle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tammy Winslow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evan Pollock + Janet Caswell13559% games+3.0% vs expected
Tammy Winslow + Deanna Childers7257% games−0.5% vs expected
Lola Bradshaw + Deanna Childers141548% games−6.9% vs expected
Bernadette Staudt + Tracy Burks4253% gamesnot enough data
Christi Wood + Tracy Burks5063% gamesnot enough data
Evan Pollock + Tracy Burks314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adele Muller
22W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Evan Pollock
37W–34L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Tracy Burks
24W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Christi Wood
19W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bernadette Staudt
31W–29L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Deanna Childers
60W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Janet Caswell
29W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Emily Jowers
45W–20L career · 16 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Lola Bradshaw
37W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Sharon Zellerer
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.57
Sylvia Howle
11W–3L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Winslow
33W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.