Teams

SFV - Befuddled Braemar Blenders (8.0)

2024 Mixed 40+ SFV Spring · SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD

15 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-11vs SFV - The 300's Mx40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDarren Chu / Kathrina Cruz vs Delia Holguin / Sunny Trinh2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Cox / Diane Perryman vs Shimon Nofar / Alice Palermo6-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesRobin Hittelman / David Hittelman vs Chad Fenwick / Tammy Scher5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-05vs SFV - Nice AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathrina Cruz / Keith Lebowitz vs Ani Aratounians / Jason Nam1-6, 2-6
2024-04-28vs SFV - The 300's Mx40Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRobin Hittelman / David Hittelman vs Linda Tubb / Ofer Shalom4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Stokols / Diane Perryman vs Joe Tomasello / Michelle Harlow3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Ingrid Konupek
published 4.5
3.86
Diane Perryman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Joanah Greenspan
published
3.81
Darren Chu
published 4
3.67
Dennis Mitchell
published 4
3.65
Kathrina Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Peter Heinbecker
published
3.61
Robin Hittelman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Lauren Koenig
published
3.56
Mikaela Nagler
published
3.53
Lisa Bourne
published
3.39
Lisa Gechtman
published
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
Julie Juliani
published
Mark Schaeffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathrina Cruz + Darren Chu404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ingrid Konupek
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
Joanah Greenspan
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Darren Chu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Dennis Mitchell
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Kathrina Cruz
221W–229L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Robin Hittelman
76W–110L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Lauren Koenig
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.59
Mikaela Nagler
26W–40L career · no lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
3.56
Lisa Bourne
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Lisa Gechtman
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.39
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Schaeffer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.