Teams

BAY TREES PK 40AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Belinda Buchanan
published 3.5
3.40
Valerie Wong
published
3.36
Cindy Turner
published 3.5
3.35
Julie Borjon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Lula Burnett
published
3.13
Nadine Joseph
published
3.11
JoAnn Pawid
published
3.07
Julie Lowe
published
3.00
Eileen Borton
published
2.93
Audrey Schroeder
published 3
2.93
Linda Duchscherer
published
2.90
Meilan Liu
published
2.90
Maria Debenedetti
published
2.85
Sylvia McCorriston
published
Elaine Hackenkamp
published
Lynne Vuskovic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Schroeder + Maria Debenedetti303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belinda Buchanan
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Valerie Wong
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cindy Turner
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Julie Borjon
92W–55L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.35
Lula Burnett
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Nadine Joseph
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
JoAnn Pawid
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.11
Julie Lowe
118W–102L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Eileen Borton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Audrey Schroeder
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
Linda Duchscherer
24W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Meilan Liu
10W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
Maria Debenedetti
29W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Sylvia McCorriston
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.85
Elaine Hackenkamp
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynne Vuskovic
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.