3.5 MVTC Edwards M18S
2022 SPRING Adult 18 & Over - CAZ · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Men
12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL ARIZONA
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule13 played
i
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Men
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1PHX/TentuBoyana/18Over/3.5M | 12 | 1 | 37 | 460 |
| 23.5 PAS Finishians M18S | 11 | 2 | 52 | 503 |
| 33.5 MTC Goats M18S | 10 | 3 | 46 | 462 |
| 43.5 PAS Ragav M18S | 10 | 3 | 60 | 562 |
| 53.5 ARR DonovanCramer M18S | 8 | 5 | 65 | 558 |
| 63.5 PTC Monarrez M18S | 8 | 5 | 70 | 555 |
| 73.5 MVTC Edwards M18S | 8 | 5 | 75 | 598 |
| 83.5 PTC Filby M18S | 7 | 6 | 70 | 612 |
| 93.5 PAS Douglas M18S | 6 | 7 | 76 | 607 |
| 103.5 WIG Fabela M18S | 4 | 9 | 83 | 620 |
| 113.5 PAS Hariharan M18S | 3 | 10 | 97 | 697 |
| 123.5 PTC PowellPerrin M18S | 2 | 11 | 95 | 656 |
| 133.5 MTC MambaTennisClub M18S | 2 | 11 | 104 | 697 |
| 143.5 PAS Servivors M18S | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 153.5 PAS Barress M18S | 0 | 13 | 98 | 676 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Jose Villagomez + Zachary Langford | 9–1 | 68% games | +10.3% vs expected |
| Kimble van der Steen + Eric Edwards | 3–2 | 67% games | +7.3% vs expected |
| Forrest Hamon + Zachary Langford | 6–1 | 62% games | +4.1% vs expected |
| Forrest Hamon + Sjaak van der Geest | 7–2 | 58% games | +0.4% vs expected |
| Jose Villagomez + Forrest Hamon | 6–6 | 52% games | −4.0% vs expected |
| Solomon Gee + Zachary Langford | 4–3 | 55% games | −6.1% vs expected |
| Matt Kim + Forrest Hamon | 7–3 | 58% games | not enough data |
| William Dickey + Eric Edwards | 5–3 | 57% games | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.