Teams

Fretz/Moore-Bowen W3.5T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-25vs Chandlers Landing/Waldron W3.5TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAllison Bowen / Callie Nixon vs Sheri Rosenstengle / Kathie Norris3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKaren Rector vs Petra Yasin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-18vs Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLeanne Moore / Hilary Baker vs Nicole Roshto / Taylor Klepsch1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Viviano / Kathleen Doepfner vs Carrie Song / Dainielle Thompson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Coy / Karen Rector vs Elizabeth Peaslee / Arlene Kirkland6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHilary Baker / Allison Bowen vs Diane Josephakis / Kelly Edwards6-3, 6-4
2026-06-04Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Coy / Joette Young vs Becky Connet / Amy Russo5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAllison Bowen / Hilary Baker vs Natalie Gilbert / Cristin Pike1-6, 5-7
2026-06-02vs High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCallie Nixon / Allison Bowen vs Celeste Schmidt / Dana Jones3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Doepfner / Judy Viviano vs Tara Glotzbach / Kelly Lilley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-14vs DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.5TWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Coy / Joette Young vs Lauren Burk / Carolyn Sexton2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeanne Moore / Allison Bowen vs Logan Shortt / Caitlin Berg7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKaren Rector vs Chelsey Horkey6-1, 6-4
2026-05-12vs Huffhines/Howarth W3.5TWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Coy / Joette Young vs Aubrey Hopkins / Sophie MacFarlan6-0, 6-1
2026-05-07vs RGAC/Lucas-Smith W3.5TWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Bowen / Callie Nixon vs Amy Clark / Mindy Lucas6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lakewood/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5T70251029296
2Samuell Grand/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5T7132822263
3DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5T71281230305
4Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5T71291132308
5McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5T71251533305
6Northwood/Pask W3.5T71271335347
7North Texas RC/Widtfeldt-Crockett W3.5T71241635323
8DCC/Filgo W3.5T71231737314
9Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5T62301023267
10Cooper FC/Martin-Christian W3.5T62291128293
11The Nelson/Stoll W3.5T62281230292
12Chandlers Landing/Waldron W3.5T62271332307
13Fretz/Moore-Bowen W3.5T62281235323
14Huffhines/Howarth W3.5T53241636336
15Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5T53211942335
16The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5T43211432312
17Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5T43201535315
18Samuell Grand/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5T43181740324
19Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5T44211944339
20Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5T44202045368
21The Lakes/Akbany W3.5T44192146340
22DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.5T44182247350
23Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5T44162455404
24North Texas RC/Cole W3.5T34191639322
25High Point/Cavey W3.5T34152044349
26Stonebridge Ranch/Wierwille-Murphy W3.5T34132247331
27High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T35182248366
28Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T35172349358
29Royal Oaks/Copley-Carter W3.5T35182249351
30Chandlers Landing/Lamarque-Dodgen W3.5T35192150374
31DAC/Barrows-Sisk W3.5T35162454392
32Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5T35142656397
33Seay/Spradling-Plummer W3.5T26172350382
34T Bar M/Dodgen W3.5T26152553381
35Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5T26152553382
36Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5T26162454378
37High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5T26142657397
38North Texas RC/Hedblom W3.5T26132758407
39RGAC/Lucas-Smith W3.5T26122860387
40Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Hatley W3.5T17122857397
41Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5T17122859431
42Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5T17122862425
43McKinney/Colston-Bowersox W3.5T0792656369
44McKinney/Lin-Hawk W3.5T08112960406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Angie Wood
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.40
Rebecca Scott
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.39
Marianna Clement
published
3.35
Susan Coy
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.25
Joette Young
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Karen Rector
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Judy Viviano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Allison Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
Jessica Lemmond
published
3.02
Kathleen Doepfner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Katy Brown
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Callie Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Hilary Baker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Leanne Moore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Cari Jackson
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Sheridan Lang
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Scott + Callie Nixon6165% games+15.3% vs expected
Rebecca Scott + Angie Wood25367% games+13.7% vs expected
Hilary Baker + Allison Bowen4352% gamesnot enough data
Callie Nixon + Allison Bowen3353% gamesnot enough data
Judy Viviano + Kathleen Doepfner3251% gamesnot enough data
Joette Young + Susan Coy4158% gamesnot enough data
Katy Brown + Cari Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Lemmond + Joette Young213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Wood
43W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Rebecca Scott
39W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Marianna Clement
23W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Susan Coy
10W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Joette Young
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Karen Rector
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Judy Viviano
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Allison Bowen
10W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Jessica Lemmond
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
Kathleen Doepfner
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Katy Brown
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Callie Nixon
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Hilary Baker
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Leanne Moore
15W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Cari Jackson
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Sheridan Lang
25W–2L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.