Teams

Chandlers Landing/Waldron W3.5T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-25vs Fretz/Moore-Bowen W3.5TLost 01
L#2 SinglesPetra Yasin vs Karen Rector2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-18vs High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5TLost 01
L#2 SinglesPetra Yasin vs Celeste Schmidt0-6, 5-7
2026-06-04vs RGAC/Lucas-Smith W3.5TWon 10
W#3 DoublesLeona Halama / Petra Yasin vs Julie Asbill / Jennifer Fleming4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-02vs Huffhines/Howarth W3.5TLost 01
L#3 DoublesShana Young / Gina Hancock vs Kerry Williams / Aubrey Hopkins4-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5TSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCallie Neatherlin / Sheri Rosenstengle vs Elizabeth George / Milensky Rega4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeona Halama / Petra Yasin vs Nicole Roshto / Taylor Klepsch2-6, 2-6
2026-05-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesSheri Rosenstengle / Callie Neatherlin vs Katie Bowden / Elizabeth McCoin6-1, 6-4
2026-05-01Lost 01
L#2 SinglesCallie Neatherlin vs Amy Russo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lakewood/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5T70251029296
2Samuell Grand/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5T7132822263
3DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5T71281230305
4Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5T71291132308
5McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5T71251533305
6Northwood/Pask W3.5T71271335347
7North Texas RC/Widtfeldt-Crockett W3.5T71241635323
8DCC/Filgo W3.5T71231737314
9Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5T62301023267
10Cooper FC/Martin-Christian W3.5T62291128293
11The Nelson/Stoll W3.5T62281230292
12Chandlers Landing/Waldron W3.5T62271332307
13Fretz/Moore-Bowen W3.5T62281235323
14Huffhines/Howarth W3.5T53241636336
15Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5T53211942335
16The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5T43211432312
17Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5T43201535315
18Samuell Grand/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5T43181740324
19Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5T44211944339
20Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5T44202045368
21The Lakes/Akbany W3.5T44192146340
22DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.5T44182247350
23Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5T44162455404
24North Texas RC/Cole W3.5T34191639322
25High Point/Cavey W3.5T34152044349
26Stonebridge Ranch/Wierwille-Murphy W3.5T34132247331
27High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T35182248366
28Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5T35172349358
29Royal Oaks/Copley-Carter W3.5T35182249351
30Chandlers Landing/Lamarque-Dodgen W3.5T35192150374
31DAC/Barrows-Sisk W3.5T35162454392
32Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5T35142656397
33Seay/Spradling-Plummer W3.5T26172350382
34T Bar M/Dodgen W3.5T26152553381
35Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5T26152553382
36Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5T26162454378
37High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5T26142657397
38North Texas RC/Hedblom W3.5T26132758407
39RGAC/Lucas-Smith W3.5T26122860387
40Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Hatley W3.5T17122857397
41Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5T17122859431
42Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5T17122862425
43McKinney/Colston-Bowersox W3.5T0792656369
44McKinney/Lin-Hawk W3.5T08112960406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sheri Rosenstengle
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.48
Allison Waldron
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.43
Tammie Bean
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.35
Courtney Bradshaw
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.32
Misty Carlyle
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.28
Laya Gan
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.24
Petra Yasin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Callie Neatherlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Shana Young
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Leona Halama
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.04
Gina Hancock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Mara Gardner
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.89
Ashli Hall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kathie Norris
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Rachael Thornquist
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathie Norris + Tammie Bean7655% games−10.0% vs expected
Petra Yasin + Leona Halama4451% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Rosenstengle + Courtney Bradshaw6065% gamesnot enough data
Leona Halama + Tammie Bean1445% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Rosenstengle + Laya Gan2343% gamesnot enough data
Callie Neatherlin + Ashli Hall4166% gamesnot enough data
Rachael Thornquist + Allison Waldron404 matchesnot enough data
Shana Young + Rachael Thornquist213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri Rosenstengle
25W–11L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Allison Waldron
42W–18L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Tammie Bean
16W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Courtney Bradshaw
15W–12L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Misty Carlyle
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Laya Gan
38W–24L career · 13 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Petra Yasin
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Callie Neatherlin
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
Shana Young
22W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
Leona Halama
19W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Gina Hancock
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Mara Gardner
20W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Ashli Hall
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Kathie Norris
19W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachael Thornquist
26W–4L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.