Teams

BLACKHAWK CC CM6.5A

2021 COMBO · Men 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-05vs CROW CANYON CC CM6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Hsieh / David Ly vs Matt Lourens / Michael Lax4-6, 5-7
2021-11-20vs STONEBRAE CM6.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Scott Takishita vs August Tuan / Ryan Kuo6-1, 6-2
2021-11-07vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS CM6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesHoon Lee / Andrew Johnson vs Giridharan Anandan / Arun Raghupathy7-6, 6-3
2021-10-30vs PLEASANTON CM6.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Takishita / Andrew Johnson vs Yogesh Vohra / Neerajkumar Chourasia6-2, 6-4
2021-10-17vs CROW CANYON CC CM6.5ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephen Brooks / Surinder Yadav vs Matt Lourens / Erik Frick7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Greer / David Ly vs Carl Buettner / Pete Brown6-3, 6-1
2021-10-03vs STONEBRAE CM6.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Scott Takishita vs Scott Powers / Jeffrey Cannon6-1, 6-2
2021-09-26vs PLEASANTON CM6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesSurinder Yadav / Ashok Ganesan vs ANAND MADDULA / Pramod Mane6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-09-22vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS CM6.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesAshok Ganesan / David Ly vs Kiran Puppala / Anup Katariya7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Robert Greer
published
3.63
John Sines
published
3.55
Ashok Ganesan
published 3.5
3.32
Scott Takishita
published
3.27
David Hsieh
published 3.5
3.27
David Ly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andrew Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Surinder Yadav
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Melvin Chua
published
2.58
Jim Plewa
published
2.48
Steve Lassig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Ly + Surinder Yadav5644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Greer
15W–26L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
John Sines
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Ashok Ganesan
16W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%36%64%
3.55
Scott Takishita
14W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Hsieh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
David Ly
48W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Andrew Johnson
76W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Surinder Yadav
26W–31L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Melvin Chua
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Jim Plewa
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
Steve Lassig
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.