Teams

Whealdon/18/3.5/BC

2023 Man · Cov Tri Level 18 & Over - Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.22 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Tri Level 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Bridgette Taylor
published 4
3.46
Amy Malloy
published 3.5
3.33
Celeste Collins
published 3.5
3.29
Courtney Dodson
published 3.5
3.20
Bridget Ory
published 3.5
2.93
Alison Beebe
published 3
2.69
Caroline Larussa
published 3
Danielle Looper
published 2.5
Katherine Hodgins
published
Lauren Parks
published
Lindsay Johnson
published
Lindsay Maxedon
published
Lisa Naquin
published
Melissa Love
published
Michelle Pecoraro
published
Morgan Dore
published
Phoebe Whealdon
published
Stephanie Hough
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgette Taylor + Celeste Collins2447% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Pecoraro + Celeste Collins2343% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Parks + Lindsay Maxedon3268% gamesnot enough data
Amy Malloy + Celeste Collins224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Malloy + Lindsay Maxedon314 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Dodson + Lauren Parks404 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Hodgins + Alison Beebe224 matchesnot enough data
Alison Beebe + Lindsay Maxedon404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridgette Taylor
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Amy Malloy
38W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Celeste Collins
33W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Courtney Dodson
21W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Bridget Ory
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Alison Beebe
64W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Caroline Larussa
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Cody Malloy Galloway
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Danielle Looper
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Hodgins
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Parks
30W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsay Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsay Maxedon
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Naquin
8W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Love
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Pecoraro
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Morgan Dore
8W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Phoebe Whealdon
4W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Hough
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.