Teams

Flight Winners - Grey Oaks - J. Archie

2021 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-17vs World Tennis Center - L. ChappellWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebra Logue / Robin Engelson vs Nancy Black / Lisa Chappell6-1, 6-0
2021-05-10vs Pelican Bay South - D. ReedWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebra Logue / Susan Aldrich vs Joann Hogan / Kate Wagner6-0, 6-1
2021-04-19vs GreyHawk - MaggalWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Archie / Debra Logue vs Janice Forner / Dina Viteretti7-5, 6-1
2021-04-12vs Olde Cypress - NavarroWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Dunn / Debra Logue vs Karey Hogan / Barbara Hurt-Simmons6-0, 6-2
2021-04-05vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobin Engelson / Margaret Werchek vs Joanne Christoforou / Cathlin Thompson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-29vs Treviso Bay - CapeWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Smith / Debra Logue vs Kathy Morris / Janet Ellis6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCynthia Streibich / Margaret Werchek vs Caroline Rogers / Constance Cape6-1, 6-2
2021-03-22vs Island Country Club - D. BurschWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Dunn / Debra Logue vs Elizabeth Burton / Julie Maly6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Debra Logue
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
3.32
Lorrie Lavery
published
Jennifer Archie
published
Julie Puntney
published
Margaret Werchek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marie Wilson
published
Peggy Hogan
published
Rhonda Kelleher
published
Robin Engelson
published
Susan Aldrich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Werchek + Debra Logue4254% gamesnot enough data
Marie Wilson + Julie Puntney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Logue
162W–90L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Cynthia Streibich
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Lorrie Lavery
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Jennifer Archie
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Puntney
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Werchek
55W–48L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marie Wilson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggy Hogan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rhonda Kelleher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robin Engelson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Aldrich
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.