Teams

Treviso Bay - Cape

2021 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-10vs Olde Cypress - NavarroSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathy Howenstine / Lisa Gust vs Minde Shinnick / Judy Kobel4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Allen / Joan Barrett vs Shelley Boggess / Tracy Hendrickson6-1, 6-2
2021-05-03vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Gust / Joan Barrett vs Shawn Fiore / Lisa Friedman7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Allen / Caroline Rogers vs Alina Reininger / Patti Ramer6-2, 6-0
2021-04-19vs Island Country Club - D. BurschLost 02
L#2 DoublesLisa Gust / Darlene Carpenter vs Keely Miller / Julie Kastholm4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Morris / Caroline Rogers vs Missy Kuklenski / Michele Maly Dykema2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-05vs Pelican Bay South - D. ReedSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKathy Howenstine / Lisa Gust vs Megan Cohen / Emie Barnes6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Morris / Joan Barrett vs Martha Oberstein / Rosemary Marinone6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Roughan / Joan Barrett vs Emily Dunn / Karen Tambellini2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Constance Cape vs Cynthia Streibich / Margaret Werchek1-6, 2-6
2021-03-22vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Murray / Caroline Rogers vs Lauren Keillor / Fiona Prentice4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Lisa Gust
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Caroline Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Joan Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Deborah Paller
published 3.5
3.08
Darlene Carpenter
published 3.5
3.05
Christine Roughan
published 3.5
Constance Cape
published
Janet Ellis
published
Nancy Murray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Rogers + Janet Ellis4353% gamesnot enough data
Joan Barrett + Caroline Rogers224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Gust
32W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Caroline Rogers
149W–130L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Joan Barrett
159W–116L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Deborah Paller
15W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Darlene Carpenter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Christine Roughan
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
Constance Cape
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Ellis
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Murray
20W–20L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.