Teams

Colorado

2023 USTA 40 & OVER · Ladies 4.0 - 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-25vs Wyoming/Johnson/40&Over4.0WWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Linda Miller vs Esther Tan / Cheryl Johnson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesColleen Muhlbradt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHelen Crews / Vicki Davis vs Sheri Foster / Michelle Bush6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMel Fernandez / Jean Taaffe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-24vs Wyoming/Johnson/40&Over4.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesHelen Crews / Laurie Yeager vs Ui Afualo / Esther Tan3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCarolayne Henry vs Anne Moore1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Jean Taaffe vs Paula Lawson / Debbie Merritt6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRenee Adams / Mel Fernandez vs Troy Ibarra / Michelle Bush1-6, 2-6
2023-06-24vs Wyoming/Johnson/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesVicki Davis / Mel Fernandez vs Sheri Foster / Troy Ibarra2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Laurie Yeager vs Paula Lawson / Debbie Merritt3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Johnson/40&Over4.0W21841097
2Colorado12481693

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Vicki Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Carolayne Henry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Linda Merigliano
published 4
3.55
Helen Crews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Colleen Muhlbradt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Mel Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Renee Adams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mel Fernandez + Colleen Muhlbradt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Davis
29W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Carolayne Henry
122W–136L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Linda Merigliano
49W–76L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Helen Crews
61W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Colleen Muhlbradt
109W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Mel Fernandez
41W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Renee Adams
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.