Teams

PLEASANTON 18AW3.5A

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2021-06-19vs PLEASANTON 18AW3.5CWon 10
W#3 DoublesHazel Indick / Elise D Harvey vs Tammie Prochazka / Gail Chin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Corazon Bellamy
published 4
3.31
Belinda Castillo
published 3.5
3.26
Alicia Barco
published 3.5
3.23
Hazel Indick
published 3.5
3.10
Lori Guariento
published
2.94
Elise D Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Lourdes Alano
published
2.93
Florita Labrador
published 3
2.57
Ruby Jane Kangleon
published
Shirley Valero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Florita Labrador + Elise D Harvey5354% games+0.1% vs expected
Elise D Harvey + Lourdes Alano213 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Castillo + Alicia Barco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corazon Bellamy
38W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
4.07
3.5
Belinda Castillo
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Alicia Barco
78W–66L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Hazel Indick
19W–12L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Lori Guariento
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Elise D Harvey
71W–78L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lourdes Alano
13W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Florita Labrador
69W–72L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ruby Jane Kangleon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
2.57
Shirley Valero
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.