Teams

Scarborough 2

2023 FALL Combo · 2023 Fall 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-30vs The Players Club 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesNazreen Khan / Andrea Perlenfein vs Nicole Kemp / Emily North3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Carroll / Chelsea Day vs Jen Reis / Melissa Ford6-4, 6-3
2023-10-23vs Racquet Club 2Won 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Girardi / Natalia Sztryk vs Yoshie Narui / Nonia Wolf6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKate Carroll / Marilee Hanna vs Mary Sibio / Stephanie Bisca6-1, 5-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Foley / Bridget Sirak vs Mara Ackermann Ziminski / Michelle Roettger6-1, 6-0
2023-10-16vs Olympic 2Won 30
W#1 DoublesBridget Sirak / Jennifer Foley vs Kaoru Wilson / Michele Devine6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarilee Hanna / Kate Carroll vs Jamie Must / TONYA LAURENT6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalia Sztryk / Nell Mayo vs Annelies Condon / Tiina Kekalainen6-3, 6-2
2023-10-09vs WickertreeWon 21
L#1 DoublesShannon Girardi / Jennifer Foley vs Christina Kulesa / Diane Crawford5-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesKate Carroll / Marilee Hanna vs Annette Dimichaelangelo / Alexandra Bernard6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Perlenfein / Nazreen Khan vs Midge Taylor / Beth Hackworth4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-10-02vs Scarborough 3Won 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Girardi / Natalia Sztryk vs Normalyn Emoff / Tish Coss6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarilee Hanna / Nell Mayo vs Traci Golis / Allison Kleinman6-3, 5-3
W#3 DoublesAndrea Perlenfein / Nazreen Khan vs Sara Zochowski / Meredith Levine6-3, 6-1
2023-09-25vs Racquet Club 2Won 30
W#1 DoublesNatalia Sztryk / Kate Carroll vs Mary Sibio / Liz Hassay6-7, 5-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Girardi / Nell Mayo vs Nonia Wolf / Donna Burian6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Perlenfein / Nazreen Khan vs Beth Kostelnick / Stephanie Bisca6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-09-18vs Olympic 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesMarilee Hanna / Kate Carroll vs Heather Brod / Tiina Kekalainen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNell Mayo / Bridget Sirak vs Kaoru Wilson / Annelies Condon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Perlenfein / Nazreen Khan vs Michele Devine / Jamie Must6-3, 6-4
2023-09-11vs The Players Club 1Won 21
W#1 DoublesKate Carroll / Natalia Sztryk vs Shelly Krauss / Emily North7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarilee Hanna / Nell Mayo vs Jennifer Murphy / Eileen Martin6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Perlenfein / Nazreen Khan vs Melissa Ford / Anne Lohrmann6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2023 Fall 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Scarborough 28020414159
2Racquet Club 18021314167
3Scarborough 353141024200
4Wickertree53131126199
5Olympic 244121230220
6Olympic 144111330209
7Wedgewood35121228211
8The Players Club 235121230213
9Scarborough 13581636243
10The Players Club 12691536244
11Racquet Club 20842042256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Shannon Girardi
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.77
Natalia Sztryk
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.49
Marilee Hanna
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Andrea Perlenfein
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.18
Laura Harrold
published
3.13
Nicki Case
published
3.10
Nell Mayo
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.07
Bridget Sirak
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Chelsea Day
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kate Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Nazreen Khan
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Girardi + Andrea Perlenfein21366% games+11.6% vs expected
Marilee Hanna + Shannon Girardi19465% games+9.2% vs expected
Nell Mayo + Andrea Perlenfein4252% games+7.9% vs expected
Bridget Sirak + Kate Carroll10456% games+5.3% vs expected
Nazreen Khan + Andrea Perlenfein4260% games+4.4% vs expected
Bridget Sirak + Nell Mayo7555% games+4.2% vs expected
Kate Carroll + Marilee Hanna15855% games+3.4% vs expected
Marilee Hanna + Nell Mayo6157% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Girardi
177W–55L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
Natalia Sztryk
177W–146L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Marilee Hanna
263W–140L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Andrea Perlenfein
62W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Laura Harrold
55W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.18
Nicki Case
48W–66L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Nell Mayo
84W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Bridget Sirak
62W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.07
3
Chelsea Day
43W–79L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
Kate Carroll
83W–45L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nazreen Khan
34W–26L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.