Teams

Scarborough 1

2023 FALL Combo · 2023 Fall 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-30vs WedgewoodLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schoenfeld / Natosha Eskander vs Deborah Nunley / Nancy Russell6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Stang / Kendra Strawser vs Ashley Skop / Sue Boudreau5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-23vs Olympic 1Split 11
W#1 DoublesLydia Stang / Stephanie Donley vs Becky Savage / Robbin Northrop4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Liebtag / Natosha Eskander vs Alisa Disalvo / Brandy Richards1-6, 3-6
2023-10-16vs The Players Club 2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Stang / Jacqueline Boggs vs Anne Houser / Laura Ubert6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Liebtag / Natosha Eskander vs Stacy McIntire / Katie Druhan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Schoenfeld / Kendra Strawser vs Metta McCoy / Sarah Mahaffey2-6, 4-6
2023-10-09vs Racquet Club 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Stang / Jacqueline Boggs vs Jessica Nimjee / Tara Iorio3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLydia Stang / Natosha Eskander vs Christina Graham / Rachel Sopkovich2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Schoenfeld / Lorraine Beidler vs Mikelle Copella / Katherine Cain2-6, 2-6
2023-10-02vs ElysiumLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Stang / Jacqueline Boggs vs Jamie Davitt / Diane Holland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLydia Stang / Kendra Strawser vs Federica Sommer / Annette Wiblin0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLorraine Beidler / Natosha Eskander vs Alison Dygert / Gigi Melton2-6, 3-6
2023-09-25vs Olympic 1Won 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schoenfeld / Stephanie Donley vs Cynthia Pawlarczyk / Robbin Northrop1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Liebtag / Jacqueline Boggs vs Lisa Jolley / Elizabeth Miller6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Stang / Natosha Eskander vs Linda Augspurger / Alisa Disalvo1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-18vs WedgewoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Boggs / Natosha Eskander vs Connie Schmidt / Wendy Haddow4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Stang / Kendra Strawser vs Heidi Baughman / Heidi Bailey7-5, 5-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Schoenfeld / Stephanie Donley vs Julie Jones / Sue Boudreau7-6, 6-1
2023-09-11vs The Players Club 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Liebtag / Stephanie Donley vs Katie Druhan / Meredith Hulse3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLydia Stang / Natosha Eskander vs Katie Heublein / Metta McCoy3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Stang / Lorraine Beidler vs Amy Barger / Sarah Mahaffey6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2023 Fall 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Scarborough 28020414159
2Racquet Club 18021314167
3Scarborough 353141024200
4Wickertree53131126199
5Olympic 244121230220
6Olympic 144111330209
7Wedgewood35121228211
8The Players Club 235121230213
9Scarborough 13581636243
10The Players Club 12691536244
11Racquet Club 20842042256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Lydia Stang
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Carrie Liebtag
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Amy Stang
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.06
Natosha Eskander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Lorraine Beidler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Jennifer Schoenfeld
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Jacqueline Boggs
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.13
Kendra Strawser
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kerry Fazzina
published
Stephanie Donley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Boggs + Natosha Eskander0737% games+3.9% vs expected
Jacqueline Boggs + Carrie Liebtag5844% games−2.5% vs expected
Amy Stang + Kendra Strawser42239% games−8.2% vs expected
Amy Stang + Jacqueline Boggs101347% games−9.4% vs expected
Jennifer Schoenfeld + Stephanie Donley3343% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Boggs + Kendra Strawser1529% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Liebtag + Natosha Eskander0633% gamesnot enough data
Amy Stang + Kerry Fazzina3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lydia Stang
35W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carrie Liebtag
171W–198L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Amy Stang
162W–160L career · 7 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Natosha Eskander
26W–64L career · 8 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Lorraine Beidler
59W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Jennifer Schoenfeld
51W–141L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Jacqueline Boggs
53W–183L career · 5 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kendra Strawser
38W–158L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Kerry Fazzina
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Donley
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.