Teams

AV Match Makers

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

19 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Deanne Saucerman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Cindy Baw
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.74
Susie Shoop
published
3.72
3.64
Julie Perron
published
3.63
Jami Shane
published
3.62
Jill Koenig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Diana Carmichael
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Tracee Nilsson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Mary Manix
published
3.44
Denise Modglin
published 4
3.42
Hannah Buehring
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3.5
3.40
Sophia McCreary
published
3.40
Cheri Ackermann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.40
Stefanie Wah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Lynne F Krueger
published
3.32
Stacy Rubeli
published
3.29
Wendy Schoenburg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Patricia Mueller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Feinfield + Jill Koenig434052% games+0.5% vs expected
Wendy Schoenburg + Cheri Ackermann402254% games−0.8% vs expected
Diana Carmichael + Christy Feinfield10657% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Schoenburg + Stefanie Wah8758% gamesnot enough data
Diana Carmichael + Jill Koenig4552% gamesnot enough data
Cheri Ackermann + Cindy Baw2452% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Schoenburg + Christy Feinfield314 matchesnot enough data
Cheri Ackermann + Stefanie Wah224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deanne Saucerman
156W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Cindy Baw
120W–91L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Susie Shoop
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Christy Feinfield
105W–88L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Julie Perron
10W–21L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Jami Shane
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Jill Koenig
97W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Diana Carmichael
81W–73L career · 1 line in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
4
Tracee Nilsson
52W–89L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Mary Manix
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Denise Modglin
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Hannah Buehring
81W–73L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sophia McCreary
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Cheri Ackermann
132W–87L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Stefanie Wah
149W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lynne F Krueger
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Stacy Rubeli
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Wendy Schoenburg
200W–104L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Patricia Mueller
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.