Teams

FTA18C/Riverside/Pompey

FTA COMBO 18 & OVER FTA Nights · 5.5 Women - Monday nights

15 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-01vs FTA18C/SpauldingFarms/AngieHillLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hood / Meg Mcgee vs Cindy Hradec / Rachel Graeber0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKim Barrs / Cristina Torres vs Cady Johnson / Krista Furman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Pompey / Emily Proctor vs Angie Hill / Madina Cauthen3-6, 1-6
2025-09-28vs FTA18C/Brookstone/WilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Hayes / Lucy Austin vs Melissa Maude / Cathy Feinstein6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJosie Sheehan / Elizabeth Hood vs Kelley Golden / Paige Botts1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Busold / Christina Pompey vs Margaret Chorazak / Lee Ann Wilson5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-09-08vs FTA18C/SpauldingFarms/AngieHillLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Stewart Zinkovich / Emily Busold vs Cindy Hradec / Rebecca Foss3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesXiaoqing Yang / Meg Mcgee vs Cady Johnson / Natallia Sianko0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Shillington-Lopez / Josie Sheehan vs Tracey MacDonald / Krista Furman4-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs FTA18C/Brookstone/WilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Barrs / Cristina Torres vs Kelley Golden / Danielle Fomin4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesXiaoqing Yang / Rachel Hayes vs Brenda Carter / Jill Przybyla6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Pompey / Tiffany Ours vs Lee Ann Wilson / Margaret Chorazak1-6, 2-6
2025-08-16vs FTA18C/SpauldingFarms/AngieHillLost 12
W#1 DoublesKim Barrs / Cristina Torres vs Debbie Hultquist / Rebecca Foss7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLucy Austin / Meg Mcgee vs Blair Zeimetz / Rachel Graeber2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Shillington-Lopez / Josie Sheehan vs Sandy Buol / Bronwen Greene3-6, 0-6
2025-07-28vs FTA18C/Brookstone/WilsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesRachel Hayes / Xiaoqing Yang vs Melissa Maude / Lisa Troup1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan MacEr / Sandra Shillington-Lopez vs Brenda Carter / Cathy Feinstein0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Busold / Barbara Stewart Zinkovich vs Madison Kaiser / Bonnie Haer2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women - Monday nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Christina Pompey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Elizabeth Hood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Sandra Shillington-Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Xiaoqing Yang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Lucy Austin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Rachel Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Cristina Torres
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Kim Barrs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Josie Sheehan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
Emily Proctor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Emily Busold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.01
Susan MacEr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Meg Mcgee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tiffany Ours
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Torres + Kim Barrs6742% games−5.6% vs expected
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich + Lucy Austin3252% gamesnot enough data
Xiaoqing Yang + Rachel Hayes314 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich + Sandra Shillington-Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Austin + Rachel Hayes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbara Stewart Zinkovich
10W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Christina Pompey
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Elizabeth Hood
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Sandra Shillington-Lopez
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Xiaoqing Yang
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Lucy Austin
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Rachel Hayes
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.53
2.5
Cristina Torres
23W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Kim Barrs
9W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Josie Sheehan
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Emily Proctor
0W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Emily Busold
2W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Susan MacEr
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Meg Mcgee
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Ours
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.