Teams

FTA18C/Brookstone/Wilson

FTA COMBO 18 & OVER FTA Nights · 5.5 Women - Monday nights

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-28vs FTA18C/Riverside/PompeyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Maude / Cathy Feinstein vs Rachel Hayes / Lucy Austin7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelley Golden / Paige Botts vs Josie Sheehan / Elizabeth Hood6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Chorazak / Lee Ann Wilson vs Emily Busold / Christina Pompey7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs FTA18C/SpauldingFarms/AngieHillLost 12
W#1 DoublesBonnie Haer / Melissa Maude vs Cindy Hradec / Rachel Graeber6-7, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLee Ann Wilson / Kelley Golden vs Natalie Ruggiero / Krista Furman5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Carter / Cara Hamilton vs Patricia Surles / Hannah Martin0-6, 0-6
2025-08-25vs FTA18C/SpauldingFarms/AngieHillWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Maude / Lisa Troup vs Rachel Graeber / Cindy Hradec2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelley Golden / Danielle Fomin vs Rebecca Foss / Elizabeth Faulkner7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesToni Sharp / Jill Przybyla vs Rebekah Fedrowitz / Beth Anne Eads6-4, 6-2
2025-08-18vs FTA18C/Riverside/PompeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelley Golden / Danielle Fomin vs Kim Barrs / Cristina Torres6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrenda Carter / Jill Przybyla vs Xiaoqing Yang / Rachel Hayes3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLee Ann Wilson / Margaret Chorazak vs Christina Pompey / Tiffany Ours6-1, 6-2
2025-08-10vs FTA18C/SpauldingFarms/AngieHillLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanielle Fomin / Madison Kaiser vs Natalie Ruggiero / Rachel Graeber4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Przybyla / Margaret Chorazak vs Angie Hill / Krista Furman1-6, 1-6
2025-07-28vs FTA18C/Riverside/PompeyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Maude / Lisa Troup vs Rachel Hayes / Xiaoqing Yang6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrenda Carter / Cathy Feinstein vs Susan MacEr / Sandra Shillington-Lopez6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMadison Kaiser / Bonnie Haer vs Emily Busold / Barbara Stewart Zinkovich6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women - Monday nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Bonnie Haer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Melissa Maude
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Lisa Troup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Cara Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cathy Feinstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Danielle Fomin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Paige Botts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.51
Kelley Golden
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
Brenda Carter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.13
Madison Kaiser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Hogg
published
Jill Przybyla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Margaret Chorazak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Troup + Melissa Maude3454% games+4.4% vs expected
Kelley Golden + Melissa Maude4163% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Feinstein + Melissa Maude224 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Golden + Jill Przybyla213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bonnie Haer
19W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Melissa Maude
57W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
Lisa Troup
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cara Hamilton
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cathy Feinstein
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Danielle Fomin
3W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paige Botts
49W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Kelley Golden
35W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
3
Brenda Carter
6W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Madison Kaiser
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Elizabeth Hogg
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Przybyla
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Chorazak
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.