Teams

Westlake Athletic Club

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-15vs North Ranch RenegadesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonnelly Wilkes / Piers Hanbury vs Gregg Gossett / Michael Lessick6-1, 6-3
2026-04-04vs Dream TeamWon 31
W#1 DoublesRJ Marozzi / Roy Ashton vs Winston Deardorff / Mike Seay6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMARK NIETO vs Yung Yi2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Wideroe / Erik Houser vs Craig Myers / Chris Mattock6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Bedigian / Kumar Desai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-22vs Chief PeakWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonnelly Wilkes / Mario Palza vs Rob Brower / Michael Matisek6-4, 6-4
2026-03-21vs Pierpont PelicansLost 01
L#1 DoublesRJ Marozzi / Donnelly Wilkes vs Steve Johnson / Mike Wofford3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-18vs Sunset HillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesMario Palza / Donnelly Wilkes vs Sid Bhargava / Eric Dyer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Liljegren / David Wideroe vs Todd Silver / Francois Odienne5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-01vs Mission Oaks FirecrackersLost 01
L#2 DoublesRyan Liljegren / Kumar Desai vs Cameron Dougan / Jack Ramirez6-7, 0-6
2026-02-22vs V-LLW Wood Ranch Hitmen- FacianaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMARK NIETO / Donnelly Wilkes vs Warren Bachtel / Kristopher Sherrill7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-15vs Mission Oaks DragonsWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Bedigian / Ryan Liljegren vs Longbin Liu / Earl Martin6-2, 6-1
2026-02-01vs Mission Oaks WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMARK NIETO / Donnelly Wilkes vs Erik Loose / Rodrigo Reis6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Donnelly Wilkes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.00
MARK NIETO
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.98
3.91
RJ Marozzi
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Roy Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Wideroe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Mario Palza
published
3.73
Erik Houser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Paul Bedigian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Jeremy Zoch
published
3.47
Ryan Liljegren
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.34
Kumar Desai
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Piers Hanbury
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

RJ Marozzi + MARK NIETO7066% games+2.5% vs expected
Kumar Desai + Ryan Liljegren2443% games+1.2% vs expected
Paul Bedigian + Ryan Liljegren314 matchesnot enough data
Mario Palza + Roy Ashton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donnelly Wilkes
33W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.04
MARK NIETO
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Bryan Quoc Nguyen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.98
RJ Marozzi
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
Roy Ashton
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
David Wideroe
2W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mario Palza
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Erik Houser
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Paul Bedigian
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Jeremy Zoch
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Ryan Liljegren
23W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kumar Desai
30W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Piers Hanbury
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.