Teams

UPTA18/Cree/Southside

2024 Fall 18 & Over-Women-UPTA · 3.5 Women FF

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-01vs UPTA18A/McCullough/KrocLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndrea Scoggins vs Gina Hungerford3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEmily Gunderson / Rachel Duncan vs Lisa Maurides / Kerry Plum5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDorothy Farmer / Kerri Hughes vs Katie Jones / Ali Hollstegge1-6, 2-6
2024-10-25vs Pratt/RiverwalkLost 13
L#1 DoublesLonna Farr / Susan McClure vs Van Nguyen / Claudia Kornaros0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Scoggins vs Hope Davis2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Duncan / Tammy Rodgers vs Melanie Pickhardt / Lara Knight6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCaroline Warthen / Dorothy Farmer vs Maryanne Spivey / Erica Ritter4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-18vs UPTA18F/McGrath/ThornbladeLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan McClure / Lonna Farr vs Patricia Gailey / Megan Christian0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Duncan / Tammy Rodgers vs Carlin Turner / Melanie Cabaniss4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Scoggins vs Laura Garrett7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Andrea Scoggins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Rachel Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Susan McClure
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Emily Gunderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Lonna Farr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Caroline Warthen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Dorothy Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Marnie Cree
published
2.65
Tammy Rodgers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Stacey Bradshaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lonna Farr + Marnie Cree1739% games−16.2% vs expected
Lonna Farr + Susan McClure2341% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Warthen + Susan McClure134 matchesnot enough data
Lonna Farr + Emily Gunderson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Scoggins
17W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
Rachel Duncan
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Susan McClure
34W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
Emily Gunderson
39W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Lonna Farr
18W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Caroline Warthen
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Dorothy Farmer
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Marnie Cree
10W–19L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Tammy Rodgers
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Stacey Bradshaw
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.