Teams

Miami-Dade - Sengupta/Crandon Park

2022 Miami-Dade TriLevel 18 & Over - Fall · 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-19vs AtzociLost 02
L#1 DoublesFederico Molinari / Nicolas Malkind vs Manuel Atzoci / Christopher Granito6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeonardo Concha / Schubert Sengupta vs CARLOS FIGUERA / Jaime Sanchez4-6, 4-6
2022-10-17vs AtzociWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicolas Malkind / Ignacio Avila vs Manuel Atzoci / Christopher Granito6-2, 6-3
2022-10-13vs AtzociSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNicolas Malkind / Ignacio Avila vs Manuel Atzoci / Christopher Granito6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLeonardo Concha / Schubert Sengupta vs CARLOS FIGUERA / Jaime Sanchez3-6, 3-6
2022-10-05vs AtzociLost 02
L#1 DoublesFederico Molinari / Rodrigo Bermudez vs Manuel Atzoci / Christopher Granito6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEduardo Graffe / Schubert Sengupta vs CARLOS FIGUERA / Jaime Sanchez4-6, 5-7
2022-09-28vs AtzociSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRodrigo Bermudez / Ignacio Avila vs Christopher Granito / Manuel Atzoci6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / Eduardo Graffe vs CARLOS FIGUERA / Jaime Sanchez6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Nicolas Malkind
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Ignacio Avila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eduardo Graffe
published 4
3.55
Leonardo Concha
published
3.48
Federico Molinari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Schubert Sengupta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
GONZALO GARCIA
published 3.5
3.22
Ivan Castro
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Federico Molinari + Ignacio Avila17263% gamesnot enough data
Schubert Sengupta + Federico Molinari5749% gamesnot enough data
Federico Molinari + Nicolas Malkind9359% gamesnot enough data
Ignacio Avila + Nicolas Malkind5166% gamesnot enough data
Schubert Sengupta + Nicolas Malkind5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nicolas Malkind
129W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
4.48
4
Ignacio Avila
121W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Eduardo Graffe
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leonardo Concha
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Federico Molinari
252W–115L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Schubert Sengupta
298W–227L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
GONZALO GARCIA
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Ivan Castro
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.