Teams

Southern: Cross Court: Wicked Winners

2023 55&Over Women · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-15vs Totally AwesomeWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hammond / Haewon Feltsman vs Randy Sutherland / Patricia Dempsey6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristy Lee / Carolynn Frankel vs MaryAnne Erickson / Vivienne Hodges6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNita Ballantyne / Carmina Magno McGovern vs Amy Lonas / Gail Cadden7-5, 6-2
2023-08-08vs Totally AwesomeWon 21
W#1 DoublesHaewon Feltsman / Kelly Maloney vs Kathleen Wise / Nadine Canino6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Augustine / Carolynn Frankel vs Vivienne Hodges / Gail Cadden6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVirginia Goldsmith / Carol Incledon vs Amy Lonas / Diane Eynon4-6, 4-6
2023-08-01vs Totally AwesomeWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Reap / Diana Regini vs Vivienne Hodges / MaryAnne Erickson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNita Ballantyne / Elizabeth Hammond vs Patricia Bradney / Diane Eynon6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Casey / Denise Mari vs Patricia Dempsey / Kathleen Wise6-1, 7-5
2023-07-24vs Totally AwesomeWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hammond / Kelly Maloney vs Randy Sutherland / Nadine Canino6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Augustine / Carolynn Frankel vs Patricia Bradney / Kim Cantine6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Incledon / Andrea Casey vs Kathleen Wise / Anna Moine6-3, 6-4
2023-07-10vs Totally AwesomeWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Augustine / Carmina Magno McGovern vs Patricia Dempsey / Randy Sutherland6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristy Lee / Denise Mari vs MaryAnne Erickson / Amy Lonas6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Casey / Carol Incledon vs Anna Moine / Nadine Canino7-5, 6-4
2023-06-26vs Totally AwesomeWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Reap / Diana Regini vs Patricia Bradney / Kim Cantine6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHaewon Feltsman / Kelly Maloney vs Gail Cadden / Randy Sutherland6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesVirginia Goldsmith / Kristy Lee vs Patricia Dempsey / Kathleen Wise5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Cross Court: Wicked Winners061625121
2Totally Awesome0621632212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Haewon Feltsman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Nita Ballantyne
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.94
Diana Regini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Carol Incledon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Carolynn Frankel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Andrea Casey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Kelly Maloney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Denise Mari
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Elizabeth Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Jennifer Reap
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Donna Augustine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Carmina Magno McGovern
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kristy Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Virginia Goldsmith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Hammond + Carolynn Frankel5449% games+12.3% vs expected
Nita Ballantyne + Kelly Maloney10361% games+5.6% vs expected
Jennifer Reap + Diana Regini421659% games+3.3% vs expected
Kelly Maloney + Diana Regini7360% games+1.3% vs expected
Nita Ballantyne + Elizabeth Hammond312052% games−0.4% vs expected
Donna Augustine + Carol Incledon4455% games−1.2% vs expected
Carolynn Frankel + Donna Augustine6451% games−3.5% vs expected
Kelly Maloney + Virginia Goldsmith6357% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Haewon Feltsman
40W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
Nita Ballantyne
120W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Diana Regini
152W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Carol Incledon
31W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Carolynn Frankel
92W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Andrea Casey
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Kelly Maloney
150W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Denise Mari
32W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Hammond
105W–115L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Jennifer Reap
95W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Donna Augustine
65W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Carmina Magno McGovern
45W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.45
Kristy Lee
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Virginia Goldsmith
24W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.