Teams

Totally Awesome

2023 55&Over Women · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesRandy Sutherland / Patricia Dempsey vs Elizabeth Hammond / Haewon Feltsman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaryAnne Erickson / Vivienne Hodges vs Kristy Lee / Carolynn Frankel3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Lonas / Gail Cadden vs Nita Ballantyne / Carmina Magno McGovern5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKathleen Wise / Nadine Canino vs Haewon Feltsman / Kelly Maloney2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVivienne Hodges / Gail Cadden vs Donna Augustine / Carolynn Frankel4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Lonas / Diane Eynon vs Virginia Goldsmith / Carol Incledon6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesVivienne Hodges / MaryAnne Erickson vs Jennifer Reap / Diana Regini2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Bradney / Diane Eynon vs Nita Ballantyne / Elizabeth Hammond4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Dempsey / Kathleen Wise vs Andrea Casey / Denise Mari1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesRandy Sutherland / Nadine Canino vs Elizabeth Hammond / Kelly Maloney4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Bradney / Kim Cantine vs Donna Augustine / Carolynn Frankel3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Wise / Anna Moine vs Carol Incledon / Andrea Casey3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesPatricia Dempsey / Randy Sutherland vs Donna Augustine / Carmina Magno McGovern7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaryAnne Erickson / Amy Lonas vs Kristy Lee / Denise Mari1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Moine / Nadine Canino vs Andrea Casey / Carol Incledon5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bradney / Kim Cantine vs Jennifer Reap / Diana Regini1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGail Cadden / Randy Sutherland vs Haewon Feltsman / Kelly Maloney4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Dempsey / Kathleen Wise vs Virginia Goldsmith / Kristy Lee5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Cross Court: Wicked Winners061625121
2Totally Awesome0621632212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Patricia Bradney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Diane Eynon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Patricia Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Amy Lonas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.32
Kim Cantine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Anna Moine
published
Gail Cadden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Wise
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
MaryAnne Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nadine Canino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Sutherland
published
Vivienne Hodges
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Bradney + Patricia Dempsey4154% games+3.8% vs expected
Gail Cadden + Amy Lonas2740% games−2.8% vs expected
Amy Lonas + Patricia Dempsey2548% games−3.8% vs expected
Kathleen Wise + Patricia Bradney2444% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Bradney + Kim Cantine3351% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Bradney + Diane Eynon224 matchesnot enough data
MaryAnne Erickson + Amy Lonas033 matchesnot enough data
Gail Cadden + Patricia Dempsey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Bradney
46W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Diane Eynon
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Patricia Dempsey
32W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Amy Lonas
13W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
Kim Cantine
19W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.32
Anna Moine
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gail Cadden
11W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Wise
5W–15L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
MaryAnne Erickson
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nadine Canino
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Randy Sutherland
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vivienne Hodges
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.