Teams

UPTA55C/Johnson/Spindletree

2025 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-20vs UPTA55C/Clator/RiversideLost 12
L#1 DoublesSally Juhasz / Tarina Mendes vs Alison Frazier / Catherine Hunt6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Blalock / Eva Mellert vs Birgitte Ahrberg / Edie Clator3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Johnson / Suzanne Pauley vs Mary Anne Larkin / Justine Allen6-3, 6-4
2025-08-13vs UPTA55C/Boliek/GCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Johnson / Jacquie Eddy vs Rae Sobocinski / Margaret Boliek6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Maly / Tarina Mendes vs Cindy Cannon / Dawn Lucas6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAdelaide Carpenter / Suzanne Pauley vs Danette Kabas / Catherine Dugas3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Lisa Maly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Cheryl Blalock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Sally Juhasz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Adelaide Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Suzanne Pauley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Jacquie Eddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Eva Mellert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Tarina Mendes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Rachel Ashley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adelaide Carpenter + Lisa Maly8072% games+13.2% vs expected
Suzanne Pauley + Jacquie Eddy8259% games+6.5% vs expected
Adelaide Carpenter + Sally Juhasz18559% games+6.1% vs expected
Rachel Ashley + Tarina Mendes3255% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Blalock + Sally Juhasz224 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Pauley + Tarina Mendes213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Maly + Tarina Mendes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Maly
43W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Cheryl Blalock
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Sally Juhasz
35W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Adelaide Carpenter
30W–7L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Suzanne Pauley
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Jacquie Eddy
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Eva Mellert
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Tarina Mendes
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Rachel Ashley
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.