Teams

WAC - Ace Kickers

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

16 players · average NTRP 3.95 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Tanja Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Lori Constan
published
3.77
Susana Zak
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.73
Devery Holmes
published 4
3.72
Claudine Stanley
published 4
3.70
Nooshin Samadani
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Debra Hair
published 4
3.66
Arielle Easton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.64
Ramona Halloran
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.63
Annie Farkas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.58
Sharon Heintz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Natalie Chesed
published
3.50
Karen Rosenberg
published
3.44
Frances Kharaghani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Doan
published
2.96
Lesley Moverley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanja Daniel + Lisa Doan2341% games+0.6% vs expected
Ramona Halloran + Tanja Daniel182649% games−4.2% vs expected
Nooshin Samadani + Arielle Easton6361% gamesnot enough data
Tanja Daniel + Susana Zak2642% gamesnot enough data
Annie Farkas + Sharon Heintz6164% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Moverley + Frances Kharaghani0629% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Halloran + Sharon Heintz3253% gamesnot enough data
Annie Farkas + Nooshin Samadani3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanja Daniel
148W–174L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Lori Constan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Susana Zak
17W–32L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Devery Holmes
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Claudine Stanley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Nooshin Samadani
105W–102L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Debra Hair
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Arielle Easton
56W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Ramona Halloran
90W–100L career · 11 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Annie Farkas
112W–106L career · 8 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Sharon Heintz
54W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Natalie Chesed
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Karen Rosenberg
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Frances Kharaghani
93W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
Lisa Doan
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.40
Lesley Moverley
28W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.