Teams

SS-LGT NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs KC-CC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Kannikal / Chris Addison vs Jerry Shoptaugh / Walter Caamano6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKevin Concialdi vs David Maas2-6, 1-6
2025-07-08vs BM BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesKevin Concialdi vs Dewey Jones6-3, 6-0
2025-07-01vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Kannikal / Chuck Nelson vs Aaron Fisch / Michael Deminski6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKevin Concialdi vs Robert White2-6, 3-6
2025-06-24vs KC-CC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Gilla / David Kannikal vs Michael Hursta / Chris Martinez2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-17vs BCST REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Kannikal / Chris Addison vs Glenn Simon / Benton Smith6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKevin Concialdi vs Mike Boyle3-6, 3-6
2025-06-03vs BM BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Kannikal / Kevin Concialdi vs Michael Burgess / Todd Fenton4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Maarten Warnaars
published
3.32
Chris Addison
published 3.5
3.28
David Kannikal
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Matt Beshany
published
3.18
Kevin Concialdi
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Eric Goldberg
published 3.5
3.16
Jason Carr
published
3.11
Tim Gilla
published
3.10
Chuck Nelson
published 3.5
2.93
Scott Holladay
published
Ryan Vegely
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Gilla + Chuck Nelson9165% games+8.2% vs expected
Chuck Nelson + Eric Goldberg8354% games+6.4% vs expected
Tim Gilla + Scott Holladay6255% games+2.6% vs expected
David Kannikal + Chris Addison4348% games+2.6% vs expected
Jason Carr + Scott Holladay5262% games+2.5% vs expected
Jason Carr + Eric Goldberg4452% games−13.1% vs expected
Chuck Nelson + Jason Carr224 matchesnot enough data
Chuck Nelson + Scott Holladay224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maarten Warnaars
61W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Chris Addison
46W–32L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Kannikal
109W–108L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Matt Beshany
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Kevin Concialdi
66W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Eric Goldberg
81W–31L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Jason Carr
54W–41L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Tim Gilla
59W–23L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Chuck Nelson
69W–18L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Scott Holladay
43W–19L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.93
Ryan Vegely
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.