Teams

LTFC NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs LEBTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesNatan Ashkenazi / Brian Hardin vs Daniel Oliver / Dan Shea6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHarikrishna Chinnamareddy vs Hernan Mendez5-6
W#2 DoublesScott Sajowitz / Ken Tronco vs Sunghoon Kim / Julio Casillas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Jaggers / Peter Hanley vs Randy Skalla / Tony Gerome6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-11vs HRCA-N GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatan Ashkenazi / James Scott vs Michael Olds / Christopher Wiksten2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Pace / Peter Hanley vs Michael Easton / Jade Walle6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKen Tronco / Vinh-Luu Le vs Brian Swift / MacK Hone6-4, 6-4
2026-07-09vs CR-B BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesJames Jaggers / Daniel Pace vs William Epping / JD Ready6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNatan Ashkenazi vs Nick Taylor6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHarikrishna Chinnamareddy / Brian Hardin vs Ryan James / Sean Page6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Hanley / James Scott vs Gustavo Belloso / Zac Storatz7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-25vs ATC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesVinh-Luu Le / Scott Sajowitz vs Jeremy Behm-Meyer / Zachary Bishop6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNatan Ashkenazi vs Tomo Watanabe4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Hardin / Pasha Smolin vs William Morris / Daniel Washburne4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Pace / James Jaggers vs John Speer / Charles Roosevelt6-1, 6-3
2026-06-18vs EM BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesJames Jaggers / Scott Sajowitz vs Benjamin Kuruvila / Jake Tiernan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHarikrishna Chinnamareddy vs Randy Mancherian6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Hanley / Daniel Pace vs Grant Glenn / Mark Lindstrom6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVinh-Luu Le / Boris Levin vs Jett Clifton / Bill Speck6-0, 6-0
2026-06-11vs LTFC PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrian Hardin / Peter Hanley vs Chris Blackman / Eric Wohl6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPasha Smolin vs Louis Engleberg6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Pace / Boris Levin vs Travis Beard / Scott Sagel6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Jaggers / FRANCISCO AVELAR vs Gregory Nelson / Fadi Zakhem4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-04vs SS-H BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesDaniel Pace / Scott Sajowitz vs Jose Amador / Bradford Winslow6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNatan Ashkenazi vs Thomas Wede6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Hanley / Vinh-Luu Le vs Josh Dougan / Francois Monnar6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBoris Levin / Brian Hardin vs Paul Whipple / Christian Thurstone6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Boris Levin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Natan Ashkenazi
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.38
Scott Sajowitz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.38
Vinh-Luu Le
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.38
Brian Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.35
Peter Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.31
James Jaggers
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.30
Pasha Smolin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.27
Harikrishna Chinnamareddy
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.25
Daniel Pace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Ken Tronco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
FRANCISCO AVELAR
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Hanley + Brian Hardin7164% games+14.2% vs expected
Daniel Pace + Peter Hanley4259% games+7.2% vs expected
Peter Hanley + James Jaggers224 matchesnot enough data
Scott Sajowitz + James Jaggers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Boris Levin
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
Natan Ashkenazi
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Scott Sajowitz
32W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Vinh-Luu Le
32W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Brian Hardin
23W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
Peter Hanley
30W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
James Jaggers
28W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Pasha Smolin
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Harikrishna Chinnamareddy
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Daniel Pace
14W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Ken Tronco
33W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
FRANCISCO AVELAR
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.