Teams

HRCA-N GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs CR-B BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesSteve Zubowicz / Michael Olds vs Andy Fingland / William Epping6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichael Easton vs Zac Storatz6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Swift / MacK Hone vs Jim Carpenter / Steve Preston1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMark Stangeland / Don Carter vs Edward Thompson / Andrew Folkerth3-6, 4-6
2026-07-11vs LTFC NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Olds / Christopher Wiksten vs Natan Ashkenazi / James Scott6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Easton / Jade Walle vs Daniel Pace / Peter Hanley3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Swift / MacK Hone vs Ken Tronco / Vinh-Luu Le4-6, 4-6
2026-07-09vs ATC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesChristopher Wiksten / Michael Olds vs Zachary Bishop / Brett Fischer4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJade Walle vs David Eckelberger4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Stangeland / Steve Zubowicz vs Tomo Watanabe / Jeremy Behm-Meyer6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Swift / Don Carter vs Daniel Washburne / Zachary Davis2-6, 3-6
2026-07-07vs EM BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristopher Wiksten / Michael Easton vs Randy Mancherian / Benjamin Kuruvila2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJade Walle vs Grant Glenn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMacK Hone / Mark Stangeland vs Bill Speck / Mark Lindstrom6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBrian Swift / Steve Zubowicz vs Jake Tiernan / Andrew Haynes7-6, 6-2
2026-06-18vs LTFC PURPLELost 13
L#1 DoublesChristopher Wiksten / Michael Easton vs Chris Blackman / Travis Beard1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJade Walle vs Louis Engleberg4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Swift / MacK Hone vs Blair MacNeill / Jerry Seay6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMark Stangeland / Steve Zubowicz vs Eric Wohl / Douglas Turner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-11vs SS-H BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesMichael Olds / Brian Crawley vs Josh Dougan / Matthew Bruff6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Wiksten vs Francois Monnar4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMiguel Phelps / Steve Zubowicz vs Thomas Wede / Paul Whipple4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMacK Hone / Brian Swift vs Bradford Winslow / Jose Amador5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-04vs LEBTC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesBrian Crawley / Christopher Wiksten vs Daniel Oliver / Dan Shea6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJade Walle vs Hernan Mendez3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMiguel Phelps / MacK Hone vs Randy Skalla / Sunghoon Kim2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMark Stangeland / Brian Swift vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Steve Zubowicz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.31
Michael Olds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Brian Crawley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
MacK Hone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Michael Easton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Christopher Wiksten
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.08
Jade Walle
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.03
Mark Stangeland
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.86
Brian Swift
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Don Carter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miguel Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Stangeland + Steve Zubowicz2357% gamesnot enough data
Mark Stangeland + Christopher Wiksten2344% gamesnot enough data
Michael Easton + Christopher Wiksten044 matchesnot enough data
MacK Hone + Brian Swift134 matchesnot enough data
Miguel Phelps + Steve Zubowicz123 matchesnot enough data
Miguel Phelps + Christopher Wiksten033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Steve Zubowicz
105W–66L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Michael Olds
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Brian Crawley
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
MacK Hone
29W–34L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Michael Easton
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Christopher Wiksten
21W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
4.12
Jade Walle
1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Mark Stangeland
19W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Brian Swift
23W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Don Carter
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.72
Miguel Phelps
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.