Teams

Boone Park - Alden

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Men - Winter · 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-16vs Epping Forest - ScherrWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Vergara / Michael Alden vs Brian Smith / Scott Kennelly6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Comiskey / Kyle Whalen vs Tyler Scherr / David Wood6-1, 6-2
2025-03-26vs Timuquana HutchisonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElias Derke / Brad Mossman vs Philip Bravo / Eric Schneider6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDan Calvo / Kyle Whalen vs Scott Meyer / Alex Nixon6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-19vs The Plantation - CunninghamWon 10
W#2 DoublesKyle Whalen / Eric Gebicke vs Richard Cunningham / Tim Baird6-4, 6-4
2025-03-12vs Mills Field - VenkatramaWon 30
W#1 DoublesSean Kelly / Michael Alden vs Rajasekar Srinivasan / Kishore Arunachalam6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Comiskey / Jay Westercamp vs Nizar Hussain / Raghunath Raman7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGarth Biggar / Danny Fehr vs Narayanan Sunderarajan / Sivakumar Gunasekaran0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-05vs Epping Forest - ScherrWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Troy Patton vs Brian Smith / Jon Lunitz6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVAN LE / Eric Gebicke vs Rob DeJesus / Tyler Scherr6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeter Martens / James Racine vs Michael Greene / John Weedon5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-02-12vs Timuquana HutchisonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Paul Vergara vs Philip Bravo / Jay Kuder6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDan Calvo / Kyle Whalen vs Billy Hutchinson II / Finley Williams6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-05vs Mills Field - VenkatramaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Paul Vergara vs Jagadesh Rajan / Sathish Pandiarajan6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Brad Mossman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.93
Sean Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Paul Vergara
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.88
Joseph Guy
published
3.85
Elias Derke
published 4
3.83
Andrew de Jong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Troy Patton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Michael Alden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Jay Westercamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Dan Calvo
published 3.5
3.37
Kyle Whalen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.31
ROBERT DOZIER
published
3.27
Peter Martens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Gebicke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
John Comiskey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Garth Biggar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Jason Moret
published
2.84
James Racine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Danny Fehr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
VAN LE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Martens + ROBERT DOZIER6078% games+25.7% vs expected
Kyle Whalen + Paul Vergara9455% games−4.0% vs expected
Brad Mossman + Sean Kelly4254% games−4.6% vs expected
Brad Mossman + Paul Vergara6350% games−5.9% vs expected
Paul Vergara + Elias Derke213 matchesnot enough data
John Comiskey + Jay Westercamp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Mossman
77W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Sean Kelly
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Paul Vergara
96W–71L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
Joseph Guy
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Elias Derke
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Andrew de Jong
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Troy Patton
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michael Alden
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jay Westercamp
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Dan Calvo
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Kyle Whalen
110W–98L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
ROBERT DOZIER
20W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Peter Martens
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Eric Gebicke
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Comiskey
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Garth Biggar
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Jason Moret
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
James Racine
19W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Danny Fehr
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
VAN LE
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.