Teams

The Plantation - Cunningham

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Men - Winter · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-16vs Mills Field - VenkatramaLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlos Muniz / John Hanlon vs Krishna Venkatrama / Sathish Kumar Ingersal7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-09vs Epping Forest - ScherrWon 20
W#1 DoublesJosh Ezring / Scott Haines vs Erik Berger / Rob DeJesus6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTim Baird / John Hanlon vs Tyler Scherr / David Wood6-1, 6-3
2025-04-02vs Boone Park - AldenLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Haines / Josh Ezring vs Elias Derke / Sean Kelly7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Hanlon / Tim Baird vs VAN LE / Jay Westercamp1-6, 3-6
2025-03-19vs Boone Park - AldenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFred Pensotti / Josh Ezring vs Andrew de Jong / Troy Patton6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Cunningham / Tim Baird vs Kyle Whalen / Eric Gebicke4-6, 4-6
2025-03-12vs Timuquana HutchisonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFred Pensotti / Josh Ezring vs Kye Coolbaugh / Jay Kuder6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard Cunningham / Carlos Muniz vs Finley Williams / Jonathan Carryl3-6, 5-7
2025-03-05vs Mills Field - VenkatramaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGary Herzfeld / Scott Haines vs Jagadesh Rajan / Venkatesh Srinivasan6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Cunningham / Tim Baird vs Nizar Hussain / Raghunath Raman3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-26vs Epping Forest - ScherrLost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Baird / Richard Cunningham vs Tyler Scherr / David Wood4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-05vs Timuquana HutchisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJosh Ezring / Scott Haines vs Eric Schneider / Philip Bravo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Fred Pensotti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Josh Ezring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Gary Herzfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Scott Haines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Carlos Muniz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
John Hanlon
published
3.10
Tim Baird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Brian Leschinski
published 3
2.70
Chandler Dora
published 3
2.67
Mark Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Haines + Josh Ezring13758% games+1.9% vs expected
Scott Haines + Fred Pensotti9557% gamesnot enough data
Josh Ezring + Fred Pensotti8067% gamesnot enough data
Tim Baird + Scott Haines3449% gamesnot enough data
Scott Haines + John Hanlon4352% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Muniz + Josh Ezring2451% gamesnot enough data
Tim Baird + Carlos Muniz0530% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Muniz + Scott Haines2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Fred Pensotti
107W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Josh Ezring
126W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Gary Herzfeld
95W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Scott Haines
182W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
3.5
Carlos Muniz
96W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.71
John Hanlon
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.23
Tim Baird
29W–101L career · 5 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.10
3
Brian Leschinski
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Chandler Dora
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Christopher Gallagher
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Mark Gregory
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.