Teams

Whitley/Snap/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Women - Tuesday AM

16 players · average NTRP 4.08 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women - Tuesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Betsy Delves
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Julia Byron
published
3.97
Katherine Goodson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.91
Lolo Fuhrman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Jason Snap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Barbee Morgan
published 4
3.84
Hailey Hirst
published
3.83
Scotty Falk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Colleen Andrews
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
Christy Hermann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Gretchen Dahle
published
3.64
Stephanie Snap
published
3.63
Cindy Knapp
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Lindsey Huskey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Bailey Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Rob Whitley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bailey Cooley + Lindsey Huskey2355% games+4.1% vs expected
Barbee Morgan + Betsy Delves10269% games+4.0% vs expected
Cindy Knapp + Lolo Fuhrman7160% games+3.7% vs expected
Katherine Goodson + Barbee Morgan6063% games+0.7% vs expected
Barbee Morgan + Gretchen Dahle4260% games−1.2% vs expected
Cindy Knapp + Scotty Falk4163% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Goodson + Betsy Delves3262% gamesnot enough data
Hailey Hirst + Barbee Morgan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Betsy Delves
38W–12L career · type D · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Julia Byron
33W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
Katherine Goodson
44W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Lolo Fuhrman
21W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Jason Snap
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Barbee Morgan
33W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Hailey Hirst
21W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Scotty Falk
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Colleen Andrews
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Christy Hermann
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Gretchen Dahle
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Stephanie Snap
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Cindy Knapp
32W–22L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Lindsey Huskey
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Bailey Cooley
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Rob Whitley
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.