← Search

Jason Snap

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NASHVILLE, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 156W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history205 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Demouy/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Reeve
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-23 · Demouy/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Igor Shalkevich
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Snap mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Snap mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-22 · Faldetta/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Kantor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Snap mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Snap mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
Jim Baker / Jordan Baker
2026-08-13 · Seven Hills II/Piovarcy · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Chris Kelley
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Faldetta/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Kantor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-26 · Hunter/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Snap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Hunter/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · Curran/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Curran
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.8% of games
3.5
93.8%
30W–2L · 69.2% of games
4.0
73.3%
44W–16L · 57.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
8W–0L · 72.9% of games
7.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 67% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 54% of games
4.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 31.8% of games
7.0mixed
90.6%
29W–3L · 67.8% of games
8.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams