Teams

AATL/Hirsch/Woodside

2026 SC Adult COMBO 18 & Over-AATL · Adult Men 18 & Over Combo 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-17vs AATL/Reese/WoodsideLost 03
L#1 DoublesGordon Daly / Jeffrey Crenshaw vs Douglas Stahura / Jeffrey Homan6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWill Chafin / William Waldrop vs Bryan Pittman / Steve Watson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesScott Hirsch / Craig Benardo vs Byron Bush / David Hughes5-7, 3-6
2026-07-06vs AATL/Reese/WoodsideWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Waldrop / Jeffrey Crenshaw vs Bryan Pittman / Byron Bush7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarcelo Carvajal / Scott Hirsch vs Mark Lopez / Steve Watson6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Men 18 & Over Combo 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AATL/Reese/Woodside1142452
2AATL/Hirsch/Woodside1124860

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Baker Leigh
published 3.5
Gordon Daly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Scott Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Marcelo Carvajal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
William Waldrop
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Jeffrey Crenshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Benjamin Proctor
published 3
Craig Benardo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Hules
published 3
2.64
Will Chafin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Myron Bratton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Hirsch + Marcelo Carvajal213 matchesnot enough data
Scott Hirsch + Jeffrey Crenshaw123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Baker Leigh
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gordon Daly
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Scott Hirsch
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Marcelo Carvajal
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
William Waldrop
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jeffrey Crenshaw
13W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Benjamin Proctor
19W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Craig Benardo
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
David Hules
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Will Chafin
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
Myron Bratton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.