Teams

AATL/Reese/Woodside

2026 SC Adult COMBO 18 & Over-AATL · Adult Men 18 & Over Combo 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-17vs AATL/Hirsch/WoodsideWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas Stahura / Jeffrey Homan vs Gordon Daly / Jeffrey Crenshaw7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBryan Pittman / Steve Watson vs Will Chafin / William Waldrop6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesByron Bush / David Hughes vs Scott Hirsch / Craig Benardo7-5, 6-3
2026-07-06vs AATL/Hirsch/WoodsideLost 02
L#1 DoublesBryan Pittman / Byron Bush vs William Waldrop / Jeffrey Crenshaw6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Lopez / Steve Watson vs Marcelo Carvajal / Scott Hirsch0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Men 18 & Over Combo 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AATL/Reese/Woodside1142452
2AATL/Hirsch/Woodside1124860

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Chad Matthews
published 3.5
3.29
Douglas Stahura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Gregory Reese
published 3.5
3.16
Bryan Pittman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Jeffrey Homan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
David Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Byron Bush
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Steve Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chad Matthews
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Douglas Stahura
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Gregory Reese
17W–14L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bryan Pittman
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jeffrey Homan
21W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
David Hughes
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Byron Bush
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Watson
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
Mark Lopez
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.