Teams

Sarasota/Armiak

2026 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · 7.0 W Friday

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-21vs GT Bray Senior-RitasWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Mae Preston vs Beth Arndt / Faye Blakely6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Armiak / Laura Hermiz vs Helene Franco / Stacy Moran6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Heitzner / Sarah Crawford vs Nancy LeFevre / Stephanie Paulson6-2, 6-3
2025-11-14vs LWN ArringtonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Mae Preston vs Tammy Hallam / Carol Williams-Cameron6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Armiak / Renita Domek vs Julie Eriksen / Ana Bautista0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristi Deakin / Linda Heitzner vs Carol Hamersky / Kim Cesareo6-4, 6-4
2025-11-07vs Rosedale RosaritasWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Mae Preston vs Debra Chaffee / Linda Frazier6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Armiak / Renita Domek vs Kelli Miller / Helen Fatzinger6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Knight / Ellyn McLaughlin vs Shelley Johnson / Sandy Vaughan6-0, 7-6
2025-10-31vs GT Bray Senior-RitasLost 12
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Susan Knight vs Beth Arndt / Carrie Scalcucci7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarlene Searle / Laura Hermiz vs Patricia Beckwith / Terry Olsen4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristi Deakin / Renita Domek vs Helene Franco / Stacy Moran4-6, 3-6
2025-10-24vs SSC KleindienstWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Mae Preston vs Elizabeth Micek / Gina Warren6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Crawford / Linda Heitzner vs Brooke Belodoff / Michelle Olson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Knight / Ellyn McLaughlin vs Kathy Sawyer / Zora Trujic4-6, 1-6
2025-10-17vs LWR SteffensWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Mae Preston vs Regina Beatty / Kristine Scott6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Armiak / Marlene Searle vs Loel Davenport / Patricia Cunningham7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Crawford / Linda Heitzner vs DeAnne Fischer / Noelle Hage7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-03vs LBK Club HowardWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Mae Preston vs Nancy Smith / Margie Stauffer6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Heitzner / Sarah Crawford vs Deanna Rollyson / Kimberley Wilson7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Armiak / Jeanne Shklyar vs Karen Nejdawi / Susan Travers6-1, 6-0
2025-09-26vs LWN ArringtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Borden / Jeanne Shklyar vs Tammy Hallam / Sherry Chase6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMae Preston / Marlene Searle vs Ana Bautista / Erin Neufelder6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Crawford / Gina Ferlise vs Carol Hamersky / Julie Eriksen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Jacqueline Borden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Mae Preston
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.44
Linda Heitzner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Jeanne Shklyar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Laura Hermiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Marlene Searle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Linda Armiak
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Sarah Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Ellyn McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Renita Domek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Susan Knight
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Christi Deakin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Gina Ferlise
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Houston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Knight + Ellyn McLaughlin4450% games+2.0% vs expected
Mae Preston + Jacqueline Borden6072% gamesnot enough data
Linda Heitzner + Sarah Crawford3256% gamesnot enough data
Linda Heitzner + Christi Deakin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqueline Borden
24W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Mae Preston
11W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Linda Heitzner
26W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Jeanne Shklyar
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Laura Hermiz
40W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Marlene Searle
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Linda Armiak
126W–106L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Sarah Crawford
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Ellyn McLaughlin
89W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Renita Domek
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Susan Knight
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Gina Ferlise
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Susan Houston
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.