Teams

LBK Club Howard

2026 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · 7.0 W Friday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-05vs LWN ArringtonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Nancy Smith vs Ana Bautista / Sherry Chase6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Catherine Meyer / Ann Miklas vs Julie Cook / Carol Hamersky6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCyn Gillespie / Deanna Rollyson vs Teresa Knight / Susan Schumacher6-2, 7-5
2025-11-21vs Rosedale RosaritasWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnn Miklas / Kimberley Wilson vs Cathy Lakos / Marlowe Sutton3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKimberly Howard / Deanna Rollyson vs Debbie Jarrettbangs / Helen Fatzinger6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Margie Stauffer vs Shelley Johnson / Sandy Vaughan6-0, 6-1
2025-11-07vs LWN ArringtonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Cyn Gillespie vs Tammy Hallam / Ana Bautista6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMargie Stauffer / Nancy Smith vs Sherry Chase / Kim Cesareo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Winder / Ann Miklas vs Teresa Knight / Susan Schumacher7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-31vs Rosedale RosaritasWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Howard / Kimberley Wilson vs Debra Chaffee / Linda Frazier6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Smith / Betsy Winder vs Liz Biddlecome / Cathy Lakos6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Susan Travers vs Carolyn Scott / Sandy Vaughan6-1, 6-3
2025-10-24vs GT Bray Senior-RitasWon 21
L#1 DoublesBetsy Winder / Nancy Smith vs Beth Arndt / Margaret Kirkland0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCyn Gillespie / Deanna Rollyson vs Stephanie Paulson / Stacy Moran6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Howard / Kimberley Wilson vs Faye Blakely / Catherine Bartlett7-6, 6-2
2025-10-17vs SSC KleindienstWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberley Wilson / Ann Miklas vs Karen Kondrad / Jo Kleindienst6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMargie Stauffer / Deanna Rollyson vs Lisa Pyser / Sandra Poston3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Smith / Betsy Winder vs Kathy Sawyer / Zora Trujic6-4, 6-2
2025-10-10vs LWR SteffensWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Howard / Deanna Rollyson vs DeAnne Fischer / Debbie Bieringer6-4, 6-2
2025-10-03vs Sarasota/ArmiakLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Smith / Margie Stauffer vs Jacqueline Borden / Mae Preston3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Kimberley Wilson vs Linda Heitzner / Sarah Crawford6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Susan Travers vs Linda Armiak / Jeanne Shklyar1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ann Miklas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Cyn Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Deanna Rollyson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.28
Betsy Winder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Karen Nejdawi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ann Fangue
published
Kimberley Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberly Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Margie Stauffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Travers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Miklas + Kimberley Wilson5160% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Howard + Deanna Rollyson4160% gamesnot enough data
Karen Nejdawi + Deanna Rollyson2346% gamesnot enough data
Ann Miklas + Deanna Rollyson224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Smith + Karen Nejdawi314 matchesnot enough data
Ann Miklas + Kimberly Howard213 matchesnot enough data
Margie Stauffer + Nancy Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Smith + Betsy Winder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Miklas
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Cyn Gillespie
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Deanna Rollyson
39W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Betsy Winder
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Karen Nejdawi
41W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Ann Fangue
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberley Wilson
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Howard
30W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margie Stauffer
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Catherine Meyer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Smith
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Travers
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.