Teams

Total Tennis

2022 55&Over Women · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-22vs MH: Cross Court: Wicked WinnersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Wise / Nadine Canino vs Jennifer Reap / Carmina Magno McGovern5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Cohen / Melissa Mayes vs Kathy McCabe / Andrea Casey7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGail Cadden / Amy Lonas vs Donna Augustine / Elizabeth McGahay5-7, 2-6
2022-08-08vs TSR: Broads with BallsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Crego / Kim Cantine vs Victoria Dunning / Christine Blossy6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGail Cadden / Wendy Cohen vs Maria Hickey / Mary Ann Cristiano2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Lonas / Melissa Mayes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-02vs MH: Cross Court: Wicked WinnersLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Mayes / Nadine Canino vs Carolynn Frankel / Cheryl Peruffo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Lonas / Kathleen Wise vs Donna Augustine / Jayasree Kaja6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Bradney / Kim Cantine vs Carol Incledon / Mary Anne Rohmann6-1, 6-2
2022-07-19vs TSR: Broads with BallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesNadine Canino / Randy Sutherland vs Cheryl Palmer / Maria Hickey2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPatricia Bradney / Kimberly Putman vs Melissa Glass / Jodi Brodsky3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGail Cadden / Melissa Mayes vs Vicki Molodec / Wendy Lois2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-11vs MH: Cross Court: Wicked WinnersLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Crego / Kimberly Putman vs Kelly Maloney / Donna Augustine0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Mayes / Gail Cadden vs Denise Mari / Kathy McCabe3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Cohen / Amy Lonas vs Cheryl Peruffo / Carmina Magno McGovern1-6, 0-6
2022-06-29vs TSR: Broads with BallsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNadine Canino / Randy Sutherland vs Cheryl Palmer / Suzanne Ward6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPatricia Bradney / Kim Cantine vs Mary Ann Cristiano / Vicki Molodec6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Lonas / Kathleen Wise vs Christine Blossy / Victoria Dunning6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MH: Cross Court: Wicked Winners6014412130
2Total Tennis2481022166
3TSR: Broads with Balls1551328200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Melissa Mayes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Patricia Bradney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Randy Sutherland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Wendy Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Kimberly Putman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Amy Lonas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.32
Kim Cantine
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gail Cadden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kathleen Wise
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Nadine Canino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Crego
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Mayes + Gail Cadden3550% games+3.6% vs expected
Gail Cadden + Amy Lonas2740% games−4.2% vs expected
Kathleen Wise + Patricia Bradney2543% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Bradney + Kim Cantine3351% gamesnot enough data
Nadine Canino + Randy Sutherland1444% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Bradney + Wendy Cohen314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Mayes + Wendy Cohen224 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Bradney + Gail Cadden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Mayes
65W–88L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Patricia Bradney
46W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Randy Sutherland
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Wendy Cohen
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Kimberly Putman
4W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Amy Lonas
16W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.47
Kim Cantine
21W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Gail Cadden
15W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Wise
6W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nadine Canino
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Crego
28W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.