Teams

MH: Cross Court: Wicked Winners

2022 55&Over Women · 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-22vs Total TennisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Reap / Carmina Magno McGovern vs Kathleen Wise / Nadine Canino7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathy McCabe / Andrea Casey vs Wendy Cohen / Melissa Mayes6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Augustine / Elizabeth McGahay vs Gail Cadden / Amy Lonas7-5, 6-2
2022-08-16vs TSR: Broads with BallsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNita Ballantyne / Elizabeth Hammond vs Melissa Glass / Jodi Brodsky6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Reap / Kelly Maloney vs Vicki Molodec / Linda Paiva6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElizabeth McGahay / Mary Anne Rohmann vs Kelly Curran / Suzanne Ward5-7, 4-6
2022-08-02vs Total TennisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolynn Frankel / Cheryl Peruffo vs Melissa Mayes / Nadine Canino2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Augustine / Jayasree Kaja vs Amy Lonas / Kathleen Wise4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Incledon / Mary Anne Rohmann vs Patricia Bradney / Kim Cantine1-6, 2-6
2022-07-27vs TSR: Broads with BallsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Augustine / Carolynn Frankel vs Audrey S-Morgan / Mary Ann Cristiano6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Casey / Denise Mari vs Victoria Dunning / Christine Blossy7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVirginia Goldsmith / Kathy McCabe vs Susan Decker / Linda Paiva6-2, 6-1
2022-07-26vs TSR: Broads with BallsWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hammond / Nita Ballantyne vs Cheryl Palmer / Maria Hickey6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarmina Magno McGovern / Virginia Goldsmith vs Melissa Glass / Jodi Brodsky6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Incledon / Jayasree Kaja vs Audrey S-Morgan / Suzanne Ward6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-11vs Total TennisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Maloney / Donna Augustine vs Sharon Crego / Kimberly Putman6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDenise Mari / Kathy McCabe vs Melissa Mayes / Gail Cadden6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Peruffo / Carmina Magno McGovern vs Wendy Cohen / Amy Lonas6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MH: Cross Court: Wicked Winners6014412130
2Total Tennis2481022166
3TSR: Broads with Balls1551328200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Nita Ballantyne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Carolynn Frankel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Carol Incledon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Kelly Maloney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.77
Cheryl Peruffo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Andrea Casey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Denise Mari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Elizabeth Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Jennifer Reap
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Elizabeth McGahay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Donna Augustine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.45
Carmina Magno McGovern
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jayasree Kaja
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy McCabe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Virginia Goldsmith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Hammond + Carolynn Frankel5449% games+12.0% vs expected
Nita Ballantyne + Jennifer Reap3354% games+5.1% vs expected
Nita Ballantyne + Kelly Maloney10361% games+4.6% vs expected
Donna Augustine + Carol Incledon4455% games+0.4% vs expected
Nita Ballantyne + Elizabeth Hammond312052% games−1.0% vs expected
Kelly Maloney + Virginia Goldsmith7359% games−3.3% vs expected
Carolynn Frankel + Donna Augustine6451% games−3.8% vs expected
Kelly Maloney + Elizabeth Hammond4449% games−11.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nita Ballantyne
125W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Carolynn Frankel
92W–104L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Carol Incledon
31W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Kelly Maloney
150W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cheryl Peruffo
31W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andrea Casey
23W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Denise Mari
32W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Hammond
105W–115L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Jennifer Reap
98W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Elizabeth McGahay
29W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Donna Augustine
67W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Carmina Magno McGovern
56W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
Jayasree Kaja
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy McCabe
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Virginia Goldsmith
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.